Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). A couple of comments: 1. We have "quorum.voters=1@kafka-1:9092, 2@kafka-2:9092, 3@kafka-3:9092". Could this be a bit confusing given that the authority part of a url is defined as "authority = [userinfo@]host[:port]"? 2. With regards to the Quorum State file, do we have anything that helps us detect corruption?
Ismael On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:03 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hi All, I'd like to start a vote on this proposal: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-595%3A+A+Raft+Protocol+for+the+Metadata+Quorum > . > The discussion has been active for a bit more than 3 months and I think the > main points have been addressed. We have also moved some of the pieces into > follow-up proposals, such as KIP-630. > > Please keep in mind that the details are bound to change as all of > the pieces start coming together. As usual, we will keep this thread > notified of such changes. > > For me personally, this is super exciting since we have been thinking about > this work ever since I started working on Kafka! I am +1 of course. > > Best, > Jason >
