Hi Badai,

Thanks for picking this up. I've reviewed the KIP document and
the threads you linked. I think we may want to make more 
improvements in the future to the printing of headers in particular,
but this KIP seems like a clear benefit already. I think we can
take it incrementally.

I'm +1 (binding)

Thanks,
-John

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, at 09:57, Badai Aqrandista wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> After resurrecting the discussion thread [1] for KIP-431 and have not
> received any further feedback for 2 weeks, I would like to resurrect
> the voting thread [2] for KIP-431.
> 
> I have updated KIP-431 wiki page
> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-431%3A+Support+of+printing+additional+ConsumerRecord+fields+in+DefaultMessageFormatter)
> to address Ismael's comment on that thread [3].
> 
> Does anyone else have other comments or objections about this KIP?
> 
> [1] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raabf3268ed05931b8a048fce0d6cdf6a326aee4b0d89713d6e6998d6%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> 
> [2] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/41fff34873184625370f9e76b8d9257f7a9e7892ab616afe64b4f67c%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> 
> [3] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99e9cbaad4a0a49b96db104de450c9f488d4b2b03a09b991bcbadbc7%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Badai
>

Reply via email to