Hi Badai, Thanks for picking this up. I've reviewed the KIP document and the threads you linked. I think we may want to make more improvements in the future to the printing of headers in particular, but this KIP seems like a clear benefit already. I think we can take it incrementally.
I'm +1 (binding) Thanks, -John On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, at 09:57, Badai Aqrandista wrote: > Hi all > > After resurrecting the discussion thread [1] for KIP-431 and have not > received any further feedback for 2 weeks, I would like to resurrect > the voting thread [2] for KIP-431. > > I have updated KIP-431 wiki page > (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-431%3A+Support+of+printing+additional+ConsumerRecord+fields+in+DefaultMessageFormatter) > to address Ismael's comment on that thread [3]. > > Does anyone else have other comments or objections about this KIP? > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raabf3268ed05931b8a048fce0d6cdf6a326aee4b0d89713d6e6998d6%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > > [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/41fff34873184625370f9e76b8d9257f7a9e7892ab616afe64b4f67c%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > > [3] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99e9cbaad4a0a49b96db104de450c9f488d4b2b03a09b991bcbadbc7%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > > -- > Thanks, > Badai >
