Excellent. Would like to hear more feedback from others.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:27 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote: > > Hi Badai, > > Thanks for your reply. > > 2. Yes, that makes sense. > > Best, > David > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:08 PM Badai Aqrandista <ba...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > David > > > > Thank you for replying > > > > 1. It seems that `print.partition` is already implemented. Do you confirm? > > BADAI: Yes, you are correct. I have removed it from the KIP. > > > > 2. Will `null.literal` be only used when the value of the message > > is NULL or for any fields? Also, it seems that we print out "null" > > today when the key or the value is empty. Shall we use "null" as > > a default instead of ""? > > BADAI: For any fields. Do you think this is useful? > > > > 3. Could we add a small example of the output in the KIP? > > BADAI: Yes, I have updated the KIP to add a couple of example. > > > > 4. When there are no headers, are we going to print something > > to indicate it to the user? For instance, we print out NO_TIMESTAMP > > where there is no timestamp. > > BADAI: Yes, good idea. I have updated the KIP to print NO_HEADERS. > > > > Thanks > > Badai > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:25 PM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Badai, > > > > > > Thanks for resuming this. I have few small comments: > > > > > > 1. It seems that `print.partition` is already implemented. Do you > > confirm? > > > > > > 2. Will `null.literal` be only used when the value of the message > > > is NULL or for any fields? Also, it seems that we print out "null" > > > today when the key or the value is empty. Shall we use "null" as > > > a default instead of ""? > > > > > > 3. Could we add a small example of the output in the KIP? > > > > > > 4. When there are no headers, are we going to print something > > > to indicate it to the user? For instance, we print out NO_TIMESTAMP > > > where there is no timestamp. > > > > > > Best, > > > David > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:53 PM Badai Aqrandista <ba...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I have contacted Mateusz separately and he is ok for me to take over > > > > KIP-431: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-431%3A+Support+of+printing+additional+ConsumerRecord+fields+in+DefaultMessageFormatter > > > > > > > > I have updated it a bit. Can anyone give a quick look at it again and > > > > give me some feedback? > > > > > > > > This feature will be very helpful for people supporting Kafka in > > > > operations. > > > > > > > > If it is ready for a vote, please let me know. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Badai > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:59 PM Badai Aqrandista <ba...@confluent.io> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Mateusz > > > > > > > > > > This KIP would be very useful for debugging. But the last discussion > > > > > is in Feb 2019. > > > > > > > > > > Are you ok if I take over this KIP? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Badai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks, > > > > Badai > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Badai > > -- Thanks, Badai
