Hi Badai,

Thanks for your reply.

2. Yes, that makes sense.

Best,
David

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:08 PM Badai Aqrandista <ba...@confluent.io> wrote:

> David
>
> Thank you for replying
>
> 1. It seems that `print.partition` is already implemented. Do you confirm?
> BADAI: Yes, you are correct. I have removed it from the KIP.
>
> 2. Will `null.literal` be only used when the value of the message
> is NULL or for any fields? Also, it seems that we print out "null"
> today when the key or the value is empty. Shall we use "null" as
> a default instead of ""?
> BADAI: For any fields. Do you think this is useful?
>
> 3. Could we add a small example of the output in the KIP?
> BADAI: Yes, I have updated the KIP to add a couple of example.
>
> 4. When there are no headers, are we going to print something
> to indicate it to the user? For instance, we print out NO_TIMESTAMP
> where there is no timestamp.
> BADAI: Yes, good idea. I have updated the KIP to print NO_HEADERS.
>
> Thanks
> Badai
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:25 PM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Badai,
> >
> > Thanks for resuming this. I have few small comments:
> >
> > 1. It seems that `print.partition` is already implemented. Do you
> confirm?
> >
> > 2. Will `null.literal` be only used when the value of the message
> > is NULL or for any fields? Also, it seems that we print out "null"
> > today when the key or the value is empty. Shall we use "null" as
> > a default instead of ""?
> >
> > 3. Could we add a small example of the output in the KIP?
> >
> > 4. When there are no headers, are we going to print something
> > to indicate it to the user? For instance, we print out NO_TIMESTAMP
> > where there is no timestamp.
> >
> > Best,
> > David
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:53 PM Badai Aqrandista <ba...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have contacted Mateusz separately and he is ok for me to take over
> > > KIP-431:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-431%3A+Support+of+printing+additional+ConsumerRecord+fields+in+DefaultMessageFormatter
> > >
> > > I have updated it a bit. Can anyone give a quick look at it again and
> > > give me some feedback?
> > >
> > > This feature will be very helpful for people supporting Kafka in
> > > operations.
> > >
> > > If it is ready for a vote, please let me know.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Badai
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:59 PM Badai Aqrandista <ba...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Mateusz
> > > >
> > > > This KIP would be very useful for debugging. But the last discussion
> > > > is in Feb 2019.
> > > >
> > > > Are you ok if I take over this KIP?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Badai
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Badai
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Badai
>

Reply via email to