hi Cheng seems the "Next KIP Number" is not synced :(
I have updated my KIP number and corrected the "Next KIP Number" thanks for the reminder. On 2020/03/19 02:32:55, "Cheng Pan" <379377...@qq.com> wrote: > Hi Chia-Ping, > > > I'm afraid the KIP number is conflict. I created (KIP-581: Value of optional > null field which has default value) yesterday early, and insert it into table > [KIPs under discussion]. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-581%3A+Value+of+optional+null+field+which+has+default+value > > > Would you please choose another KIP number, maybe 583, I also see KIP-582 > discussion thread appears in the mail list, and insert into table [KIPs under > discussion]. > > > Best Regards, > Cheng Pan > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: "Chia-Ping Tsai";<chia7...@apache.org>; > Send time: Thursday, Mar 19, 2020 1:48 AM > To: "dev"<dev@kafka.apache.org>; > > Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-581: add tag "partition" to BrokerTopicMetrics so as > to observe the partition metrics on the same broker > > > > hi > > this ticket is about to records partition metrics rather than topic metrics. > It helps us to observe more precis metrics for specify partition. The > downside is that broker needs more space to keep metrics and the origin > metrics interface (tags) is broken since this ticket adds new tag > "partition=xxx" to it. The alternative is an new config flag used to enable > new metrics (of course, it is false by default). Also, we ought to provide > enough document to explain benefit and cost of new metrics. > > KIP-581 > (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=148642648) > > JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9730) > > Please take a look :) > > Best Regards, > Chia-Ping
