I like the drawings too :) On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 3:35 AM Patrik Kleindl <pklei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great idea, I would definitely buy the book with that on the cover :-) > best regards > Patrik > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 09:57, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I also like this one! > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:07 AM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > I personally love it! > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > On 3/12/20 11:31 AM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > > > > How reasonable of it. Let's try this again: > > > > Streams Logo option 2 > > > > > > > < > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1WoWn0kF3E7dbL1FGYT8_-bIeT2IjfYORAm6gg8Ils4k/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 9:34 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Sophie, > > > >> > > > >> I cannot find the attachment from your previous email --- in fact, > ASF > > > >> mailing list usually blocks all attachments for security reasons. If > > you > > > >> can share a link to the image (google drawings etc) in your email > that > > > >> would be great. > > > >> > > > >> Guozhang > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:02 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > > sop...@confluent.io> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Just to throw another proposal out there and inspire some debate, > > > here's > > > >>> a similar-but-different > > > >>> idea (inspired by John + some sketches I found on google): > > > >>> > > > >>> *~~ See attachment, inlined image is too large for the mailing list > > ~~* > > > >>> > > > >>> This one's definitely more fun, my only concern is that it doesn't > > > really > > > >>> scale well. At the lower end > > > >>> of sizes the otters will be pretty difficult to see; and I had to > > > stretch > > > >>> out the Kafka circles even at > > > >>> the larger end just to fit them through. > > > >>> > > > >>> But maybe with a cleaner drawing and some color it'll still look > > > good and > > > >>> be recognizable + distinct > > > >>> enough when small. > > > >>> > > > >>> Any thoughts? Any binding and/or non-binding votes? > > > >>> > > > >>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 1:00 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > > sop...@confluent.io> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Seems the mailing list may have filtered the inlined prototype > logo, > > > >>>> attaching it here instead > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 11:54 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman > > > <sop...@confluent.io> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Matthias makes a good point about being careful not to position > > > Streams > > > >>>>> as > > > >>>>> outside of Apache Kafka. One obvious thing we could do it just > > > include > > > >>>>> the > > > >>>>> Kafka logo as-is in the Streams logo, somehow. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I have some unqualified opinions on what that might look like: > > > >>>>> A good logo is simple and clean, so incorporating the Kafka logo > > as a > > > >>>>> minor > > > >>>>> detail within a more complicated image is probably not the best > way > > > to > > > >>>>> get > > > >>>>> the quick and easy comprehension/recognition that we're going > for. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> That said I'd throw out the idea of just attaching something to > the > > > >>>>> Kafka logo, > > > >>>>> perhaps a stream-dwelling animal, perhaps a (river) otter? It > could > > > be > > > >>>>> "swimming" left of the Kafka logo, with its head touching the > upper > > > >>>>> circle and > > > >>>>> its tail touching the bottom one. Like Streams, it starts with > > Kafka > > > >>>>> and ends > > > >>>>> with Kafka (ie reading input topics and writing to output > topics). > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Without further ado, here's my very rough prototype for the Kafka > > > >>>>> Streams logo: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> [image: image.png] > > > >>>>> Obviously the real thing would be colored and presumably done by > > > someone > > > >>>>> with actual artist talent/experience (or at least photoshop > > ability). > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Thoughts? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 1:08 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > > Boyang, > > > > > > > > thanks for starting this discussion. I like the idea in general > > > > however we need to be a little careful IMHO -- as you mentioned Kafka > > > > is one project and thus we should avoid the impression that Kafka > > > > Streams is not part of Apache Kafka. > > > > > > > > Besides this, many projects use animals that are often very adorable. > > > > Maybe we could find a cute Streams related mascot? :) > > > > > > > > I would love to hear opinions especially from the PMC if having a > logo > > > > for Kafka Streams is a viable thing to do. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > On 3/3/20 1:01 AM, Patrik Kleindl wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Boyang Great idea, that would help in some discussions. To > > > throw > > > >>>>>>>> in a first idea: https://imgur.com/a/UowXaMk best regards > > Patrik > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 18:23, Boyang Chen > > > >>>>>>>> <reluctanthero...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hey Apache Kafka committers and community folks, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> over the years Kafka Streams has been widely adopted and tons > > of > > > >>>>>>>>> blog posts and tech talks have been trying to introduce it to > > > >>>>>>>>> people with need of stream processing. As it is part of > Apache > > > >>>>>>>>> Kafka project, there is always an awkward situation where > Kafka > > > >>>>>>>>> Streams could not be campaigned as a standalone streaming > > engine, > > > >>>>>>>>> and makes people confused about its relation to Kafka. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> So, do we want to introduce a customized logo just for > Streams? > > > >>>>>>>>> The immediate benefit is when people are making technical > > > >>>>>>>>> decisions, we could list Streams as a logo just like Flink > and > > > >>>>>>>>> Spark Streaming, instead of putting Kafka logo there as it is > > not > > > >>>>>>>>> literally a legitimate comparison between processing > framework > > > >>>>>>>>> and messaging system. Should we do a KIP for this? > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Boyang > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> -- Guozhang > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- -- Guozhang
