I'm +1 either way :) -John
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:37 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good catch! I meant to propose the name to be "StreamJoin". I have updated > the KIP accordingly. > > As for the name, I originally had "StreamJoined" and updated it after some > comments on the KIP. > I do feel that the name "StreamJoin" is better in this case since it is > used to represent a stream join configuration vs. "StreamJoined" which > feels more like it's being used as a verb (past tense). > > WDYT? > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:48 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello Bill, > > > > The KIP's proposal has the code snippet name as "StreamJoined" but the > > class name defined is StreamJoin.Which one did you propose? Personally I > > think StreamJoined with better aligned with other control objects, but if > > you think otherwise is better I can be convinced too :) > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:38 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > All, since we have updated KIP-479 > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-479%3A+Add+StreamJoin+config+object+to+Join > > > and > > > seem to have completed the discussion for the updates, I'd like to call > > for > > > everyone to vote again. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Bill > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:46 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) from myself. > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote has been open for 7 days now. so I'm closing this vote > > thread. > > > > > > > > KIP-479 had the following votes: > > > > > > > > binding +1s: 3 (Guozhang, Matthias, and Bill) > > > > -1 votes: none > > > > > > > > Thanks to everyone who voted and participated in the discussion for > > this > > > > KIP! > > > > > > > > -Bill > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 6:03 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:39 PM Matthias J. Sax < > > matth...@confluent.io> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > +1 (binding) > > > >> > > > > >> > On 7/25/19 1:05 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > > > >> > > All, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > After a great discussion on KIP-479 ( > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-479%3A+Add+Materialized+to+Join > > > >> > ) > > > >> > > I'd > > > >> > > like to start a vote. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > Bill > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> -- Guozhang > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- Guozhang > >
