Hello Bill, The KIP's proposal has the code snippet name as "StreamJoined" but the class name defined is StreamJoin.Which one did you propose? Personally I think StreamJoined with better aligned with other control objects, but if you think otherwise is better I can be convinced too :)
Guozhang On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:38 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > All, since we have updated KIP-479 > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-479%3A+Add+StreamJoin+config+object+to+Join > and > seem to have completed the discussion for the updates, I'd like to call for > everyone to vote again. > > Thanks, > Bill > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:46 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) from myself. > > > > > > This vote has been open for 7 days now. so I'm closing this vote thread. > > > > KIP-479 had the following votes: > > > > binding +1s: 3 (Guozhang, Matthias, and Bill) > > -1 votes: none > > > > Thanks to everyone who voted and participated in the discussion for this > > KIP! > > > > -Bill > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 6:03 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:39 PM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 (binding) > >> > > >> > On 7/25/19 1:05 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > >> > > All, > >> > > > >> > > After a great discussion on KIP-479 ( > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-479%3A+Add+Materialized+to+Join > >> > ) > >> > > I'd > >> > > like to start a vote. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Bill > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> -- Guozhang > >> > > > -- -- Guozhang
