Hello Bill,

The KIP's proposal has the code snippet name as "StreamJoined" but the
class name defined is StreamJoin.Which one did you propose? Personally I
think StreamJoined with better aligned with other control objects, but if
you think otherwise is better I can be convinced too :)


Guozhang

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:38 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:

> All, since we have updated KIP-479
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-479%3A+Add+StreamJoin+config+object+to+Join
> and
> seem to have completed the discussion for the updates, I'd like to call for
> everyone to vote again.
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:46 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) from myself.
> >
> >
> > This vote has been open for 7 days now. so I'm closing this vote thread.
> >
> > KIP-479 had the following votes:
> >
> > binding +1s: 3 (Guozhang, Matthias, and Bill)
> > -1 votes: none
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who voted and participated in the discussion for this
> > KIP!
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 6:03 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:39 PM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1 (binding)
> >> >
> >> > On 7/25/19 1:05 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> >> > > All,
> >> > >
> >> > > After a great discussion on KIP-479 (
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-479%3A+Add+Materialized+to+Join
> >> > )
> >> > > I'd
> >> > > like to start a vote.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Bill
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> -- Guozhang
> >>
> >
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to