Let me go ahead and put in some time in next week to get it running again. I've only been skimming the emails lately, but is Kafka moved over to Git yet? Using Git would allow me to avoid some of the issues we ran into trying to submit an SVN patch due to deleted files, etc. Also, which branch/revision should I be targeting?
Thanks, Derek On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Joe Stein <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Derek, I totally got swamped at work and didn't get a chance to bang on > the sbt change. > > I am not a sbt whiz you might be better to get this over the finish line is > it something you might be able to-do? > > if so I can review and commit, np > > IMHO 0.8 should not ship with out supporting latest sbt and scala in a good > way it is one thing I have heard time and again from Scala community folks > from perception, contributions, etc > > let me know if you don't have time I can figure some time to noodle and > bang away again at it last time I got it all down to one test failing but > some other tickets I should attend to also > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Derek Chen-Becker <de...@precog.com> > wrote: > > > I haven't had any time to work on it in a few months, but it's definitely > > something I'd like to finish up. I think the last remaining issue is that > > SBT isn't integrated into the external packaging scripts, but otherwise > it > > should work. > > > > Derek > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Joe Stein <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I have not tried the KAFKA-139 ticket yet for latest scala but will > give > > > that a try this week. Looks cool. > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Derek Chen-Becker <de...@precog.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > In particular it breaks some tests between Scala 2.8.0 and 2.9.x due > to > > > > changes in Scala's collections impls that impact Map traversal > order. I > > > > haven't had any time to work further on the SBT cross-build/upgrade > > > ticket > > > > ( > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-139), but that was > > > definitely > > > > a > > > > blocker. > > > > > > > > Derek > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > What has people's experience with EasyMock been? > > > > > > > > > > I am really struggling with it. It seems to encourage reaching > inside > > > > > classes and programming an explicit list of calls they will make. > > This > > > > > makes the tests very fragile to internal changes. > > > > > > > > > > It also doesn't seem to play all that well with scala due to all > the > > > > > reflection. > > > > > > > > > > I was originally a big fan since it got us away from massive > > > > > non-deterministic integration tests. > > > > > > > > > > But I wonder if we wouldn't be better off just writing simple > > hand-made > > > > > mocks for major classes or increasing the quality of our test > > harnesses > > > > to > > > > > do integration testing...? > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > -Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Derek Chen-Becker* > > > > *Precog Lead Infrastructure Engineer* > > > > de...@precog.com > > > > 303-752-1700 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > /* > > > Joe Stein > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc > > > Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > > > */ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Derek Chen-Becker* > > *Precog Lead Infrastructure Engineer* > > de...@precog.com > > 303-752-1700 > > > > > > -- > > /* > Joe Stein > http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc > Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > */ > -- *Derek Chen-Becker* *Precog Lead Infrastructure Engineer* de...@precog.com 303-752-1700
