Petr,

Thank you.

Yes, I've added changes related to the new release build actions
(IGNITE-15678, IGNITE-15677). The ignite-2.12 branch seems to be
working fine, however, at the ignite-2.11.1 the error with "too many
requests" appears from time to time. Here is an example of such a
build [1].


[1] 
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=6329858&buildTypeId=Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_ReleaseBuild

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 13:20, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Concerning Too many requests error, I see the following problem:
>
>
> Your request has been rate limited, as we have detected excessive usage from 
> your IP or net block:
> 15.575 SECONDS OF TIME SPENT OVER 120 SECONDS, MAX ALLOWED IS 15.
> Rate-limits are automatic and reset every two minutes.
> If you feel this is in error, please contact the Apache Infrastructure Team 
> at: us...@infra.apache.org.
>
>
> Can someone check with them about it, please?
>
> > On 17 Dec 2021, at 13:14, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Permissions updated.
> >
> >
> >> On 17 Dec 2021, at 13:09, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Could you please add links to builds that are malfunctioning?
> >> As much as I see here [1] and here [2] — the release build changed to 
> >> comply with 2.12 changes that are not merged to 2.11.1
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] 
> >> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_ReleaseBuild/6329822
> >> [2] 
> >> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_ReleaseBuild/6329824
> >>
> >>> On 17 Dec 2021, at 12:11, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello Petr,
> >>>
> >>> Can you please assist with configuring the Release Teamcity suite that
> >>> has been changed for 2.x a month ago? These changes haven't been
> >>> discussed on the dev-list, so I'm not familiar with them.
> >>>
> >>> I've faced several issues:
> >>> - the default role for Apache Ignite 2.x (Release) suite is `Agent
> >>> manager`, however, it seems the right value is `Project developer and
> >>> queue manager`. I've looked through the documentation pages and
> >>> doesn't get an idea of how it can be changed.
> >>> - there was an issue with the Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_GitBoxIgnite
> >>> that throws `429 too many requests` exception each time a new list of
> >>> branches is fetched. I've changed the poll interval to 180 sec
> >>> (default value 60 sec), however, this change doesn't look good from my
> >>> side. What should I do here?
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 22:09, Вячеслав Коптилин
> >>> <slava.kopti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Maxim,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks a lot!
> >>>>
> >>>>> Check the following links below.
> >>>> Looks good to me.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> чт, 16 дек. 2021 г. в 20:19, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm OK with this. Let's go through the fastest way we have.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Check the following links below. I'll prepare the vote shortly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Compare branches 2.11 and 2.11.1:
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/compare/ignite-2.11...ignite-2.11.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The release branch:
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.11.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> JIRA 2.11.1 version:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Release notes:
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/ignite-2.11.1/RELEASE_NOTES.txt
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 19:30, Ilya Kasnacheev 
> >>>>> <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I also agree with Stephen. If we wanted to do a stabilization release 
> >>>>>> we
> >>>>>> should unbound it from this urgent fix.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I wonder why 2.12 is not with us already, given that it was scheduled 
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>> go
> >>>>>> out in August.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> чт, 16 дек. 2021 г. в 19:25, Вячеслав Коптилин 
> >>>>>> <slava.kopti...@gmail.com
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Given that 2.12 is so close, my preference would be to limit the
> >>>>> scope of
> >>>>>>> 2.11.1 to just the log4j update.
> >>>>>>> I agree with Stephen. Apache Ignite 2.11.1 is an emergency release.
> >>>>> Using
> >>>>>>> log4j 2.16 instead of 2.14 is a quite small change that only requires 
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> "sanity" check and can be quickly released. A wider release scope
> >>>>> requires
> >>>>>>> full testing, IMHO.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> S.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> чт, 16 дек. 2021 г. в 16:03, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think it is completely possible to move vote/release dates
> >>>>>>>> significantly forward with keeping the scope. I will take a look at
> >>>>>>>> the list of fixed bugs more narrowly and exclude some of them that
> >>>>>>>> require additional verification.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 15:55, Stephen Darlington
> >>>>>>>> <stephen.darling...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Given that 2.12 is so close, my preference would be to limit the
> >>>>> scope
> >>>>>>>> of 2.11.1 to just the log4j update. Would that help bring the
> >>>>>>> vote/release
> >>>>>>>> date forward?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 16 Dec 2021, at 12:44, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Dear Ignite Community!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I suggest preparing the Apache Ignite 2.11.1 release and I want
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> propose myself to be the release manager of the minor release.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> * RELEASE TIMELINE *
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Scope Freeze: December 16, 2021
> >>>>>>>>>> Code Freeze: December 16, 2021
> >>>>>>>>>> Voting Date: December 21, 2021
> >>>>>>>>>> Release Date: December 24, 2021
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> * RELEASE SCOPE *
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> LOG4J dependency update
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16101
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16127
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> B+Tree Corrupted exception when using a key extracted from a
> >>>>>>>> BinaryObject
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12911
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regression: Ignite node crash(CorruptedTreeException: B+Tree is
> >>>>>>>> corrupted)
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15943
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> .NET: ClientFailoverSocket sets logger too late, resulting in
> >>>>> null
> >>>>>>>>>> loggers downstream
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14776
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The iterator of the ClientCacheQueryCursor can be closed during
> >>>>>>>> serialization.
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15346
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Possible owners desync when a node is restarted while rebalancing
> >>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> enabled persistence
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15315
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thin client: Tx can fail if there are concurrent tx rollbacks by
> >>>>>>>> timeout
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15732
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> AssertionError: Unexpected rebalance on rebalanced cluster
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15033
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> JmxMetricExporterSpi throws assertion error on a filtered metric
> >>>>>>>> unregister
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15252
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ClassNotFoundException on an attempt to invoke service method
> >>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>> Java ThinClient after a cluster failover
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15256
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException on an attempt to create a Java ThinClient
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> BinaryConfiguration
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15138
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Type name is not cached on client-side for
> >>>>>>>>>> OptimizerMarshaller types
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15924
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> select count * returns multiple rows
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14120
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Fix StackOverflowError in case if an exception is suppressed with
> >>>>>>>> itself
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15716
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to