Folks,
I'm OK with this. Let's go through the fastest way we have. Check the following links below. I'll prepare the vote shortly. Compare branches 2.11 and 2.11.1: https://github.com/apache/ignite/compare/ignite-2.11...ignite-2.11.1 The release branch: https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.11.1 JIRA 2.11.1 version: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11.1 Release notes: https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/ignite-2.11.1/RELEASE_NOTES.txt On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 19:30, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello! > > I also agree with Stephen. If we wanted to do a stabilization release we > should unbound it from this urgent fix. > > I wonder why 2.12 is not with us already, given that it was scheduled to go > out in August. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > чт, 16 дек. 2021 г. в 19:25, Вячеслав Коптилин <slava.kopti...@gmail.com>: > > > Hello, > > > > > Given that 2.12 is so close, my preference would be to limit the scope of > > 2.11.1 to just the log4j update. > > I agree with Stephen. Apache Ignite 2.11.1 is an emergency release. Using > > log4j 2.16 instead of 2.14 is a quite small change that only requires a > > "sanity" check and can be quickly released. A wider release scope requires > > full testing, IMHO. > > > > Thanks, > > S. > > > > > > чт, 16 дек. 2021 г. в 16:03, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > > > > > I think it is completely possible to move vote/release dates > > > significantly forward with keeping the scope. I will take a look at > > > the list of fixed bugs more narrowly and exclude some of them that > > > require additional verification. > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 15:55, Stephen Darlington > > > <stephen.darling...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Given that 2.12 is so close, my preference would be to limit the scope > > > of 2.11.1 to just the log4j update. Would that help bring the > > vote/release > > > date forward? > > > > > > > > > On 16 Dec 2021, at 12:44, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ignite Community! > > > > > > > > > > I suggest preparing the Apache Ignite 2.11.1 release and I want to > > > > > propose myself to be the release manager of the minor release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * RELEASE TIMELINE * > > > > > > > > > > Scope Freeze: December 16, 2021 > > > > > Code Freeze: December 16, 2021 > > > > > Voting Date: December 21, 2021 > > > > > Release Date: December 24, 2021 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * RELEASE SCOPE * > > > > > > > > > > LOG4J dependency update > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16101 > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16127 > > > > > > > > > > B+Tree Corrupted exception when using a key extracted from a > > > BinaryObject > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12911 > > > > > > > > > > Regression: Ignite node crash(CorruptedTreeException: B+Tree is > > > corrupted) > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15943 > > > > > > > > > > .NET: ClientFailoverSocket sets logger too late, resulting in null > > > > > loggers downstream > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14776 > > > > > > > > > > The iterator of the ClientCacheQueryCursor can be closed during > > > serialization. > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15346 > > > > > > > > > > Possible owners desync when a node is restarted while rebalancing > > with > > > > > enabled persistence > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15315 > > > > > > > > > > Thin client: Tx can fail if there are concurrent tx rollbacks by > > > timeout > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15732 > > > > > > > > > > AssertionError: Unexpected rebalance on rebalanced cluster > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15033 > > > > > > > > > > JmxMetricExporterSpi throws assertion error on a filtered metric > > > unregister > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15252 > > > > > > > > > > ClassNotFoundException on an attempt to invoke service method from > > > > > Java ThinClient after a cluster failover > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15256 > > > > > > > > > > NullPointerException on an attempt to create a Java ThinClient with > > > > > BinaryConfiguration > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15138 > > > > > > > > > > Java thin client: Type name is not cached on client-side for > > > > > OptimizerMarshaller types > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15924 > > > > > > > > > > select count * returns multiple rows > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14120 > > > > > > > > > > Fix StackOverflowError in case if an exception is suppressed with > > > itself > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15716 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > > > >
