Hello, Pavel > But it doesn't mean that now we need to use only full names. > Abbreviations may be used e.g. for local variables with short scope. > Here we must follow common sense and existing practices of effective naming. > It shouldn't be a cargo cult as it is now.
But «common sense» has a very different definition for each community member. So, it seems, your proposal will end with different naming styles through codebase. Moreover, one reviewer will require «first» naming style and another «second» because of personal common sense. Personally, I believe strict automatically checked code style rules are better than common sense rules. Meanwhile, please, keep in mind that abbreviation rules is mandatory. And this discussion shown there are many Ignite developers who want to keep it. If someone wants to change or make it optional - please, start a vote. > 21 июня 2021 г., в 21:45, Pavel Kovalenko <jokse...@gmail.com> написал(а): > >>> But do you have a plan what should we do with the subject? > > I think we need to just turn off the required rule for abbreviations and > start to write new code without this requirement. > But it doesn't mean that now we need to use only full names. Abbreviations > may be used e.g. for local variables with short scope. > Here we must follow common sense and existing practices of effective > naming. It shouldn't be a cargo cult as it is now. > If there are doubts about naming they should be resolved on a code review. > > And we shouldn't rush to migrate all existing code to names without > existing abbreviations, it doesn't make sense - most core components are > modified very rarely now. > If you touch some class and you see that you can make existing naming > better - do it. But starting to renaming everything is the same cargo cult > but only of a different polarity. > >>> Actually it seems to me offtopic > > My concern was in Nikita's words that such rules about abbreviations > simplifies entry of new members that were actually not. > Every such rule actually complicates new member contributions. Statistics > above from Ilya just confirms it. Only 4 external valuable contributors for > 6 years of the project. 2 of them have been offline for the last 5 years. > > пн, 21 июн. 2021 г. в 05:00, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi Pavel, >> >> Thank you for sharing your thoughts! My personal opinion is very >> similar. But do you have a plan what should we do with the subject? Do >> you suggest to cleanup whole codebase from abbreviations? Or do you >> think that it is fine to keep existing code as is and avoid >> abbreviations for new code? Or something else? >> >>> Who can tell me at least 5 contributors with 10+ commits who are not >> working/worked in GridGain or SberBank? It's sad to hide behind an open >> source community that really does not exist. >> >> Actually it seems to me offtopic. But here my opinion is different. It >> is ok to me that the project is mainly driven by aforementioned >> companies. And I would rather care more about ease of single >> contributions. I contributed to other open source projects and did < >> 10 commits to each. Because in daily work generally we use stable >> libraries and can allow ourselves to work only with bugs or >> improvements in open source libraries. And I consider it a way to go >> in open source. >> >> 2021-06-20 14:13 GMT+03:00, Pavel Kovalenko <jokse...@gmail.com>: >>> I think in this discussion there should be a question - why do we still >>> need abbreviations for all variables and fields? What problem does it >>> solve? >>> Nobody still clearly answered this question. >>> I saw only 2 arguments to keep abbreviations: >>> 1) Less codebase symbols. I think it is a weak argument. We're not in the >>> 80-90s when there were no modern IDEs with hints and auto-completion. >>> Ideally code should be read just as english text. That really helps to >>> understand the code if you see it for the first time. Abbreviations >>> everywhere (except well-known CS terms) don't improve code readability. >>> 2) We shouldn't break constitency with old codebase written with enforced >>> abbreviations. Hence the question - why was this rule introduced at >> project >>> startup? Who knows that? >>> I guess most people who decided to introduce this rule left the Ignite >>> project. >>> >>>>> Consistency is what makes it easier to contribute to the project >>> Yes it is. But what makes it easier is actually clear architecture, >> simple >>> and convenient abstractions and well-documented code. Ignite has a big >> lack >>> of that. >>> For example, look at the transactions or PME codebase. It's darkness and >> no >>> abbreviations for "consistency" will help to understand that code. >>> >>>>> and attract new members >>> Who can tell me at least 5 contributors with 10+ commits who are not >>> working/worked in GridGain or SberBank? >>> It's sad to hide behind an open source community that really does not >>> exist. >>> >>> >>> пт, 18 июн. 2021 г. в 14:21, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: >>> >>>>> Agree. I think you can start a discussion and change some abbrevs if >>>>> you >>>> wish. >>>> >>>> How about keeping the abbreviation map file inside the Ignite repo? >>>> In this case, you may change the abbreviation by issue/pr covered by a >>>> green TC check. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:36 AM Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> No validation in the world prevent me from typing manually "mess" >>>>> instead of "msg"/«message" >>>>> >>>>> Code review will do. >>>>> >>>>>> btw "svc" is more common imo >>>>> >>>>> Agree. I think you can start a discussion and change some abbrevs if >>>>> you >>>>> wish. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 17 июня 2021 г., в 10:23, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com> >>>>> написал(а): >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sorry, but the rule is not strict and, moreover, not clear >> enough >>>> for >>>>>> constans. See here [1] >>>>>> ``` >>>>>> Type and method names are usually not abbreviated (except for the >>>>>> well-accepted abbreviations such as EOF, Impl, Fifo, etc.). >>>>>> >>>>>> Abbreviation applies to local variables, method parameters, class >>>> fields >>>>>> and in **some cases public static fileds** (constants) of the class. >>>>>> ``` >>>>>> But there is not any list that contains these cases. I suppose, that >>>>>> constant naming should not be abbreviated. >>>>>> As I see, the most cases of violations, described in initial post, >>>>>> are >>>>>> about constant's namings. >>>>>> >>>>>> I suppose that we should define strict and clear rules about >>>>>> constants >>>>>> naming. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] -- >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Abbreviation+Rules >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> чт, 17 июн. 2021 г. в 10:10, Konstantin Orlov <kor...@gridgain.com >>> : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Enforced validation doesn't guarantee code consistency. No >>>>>>> validation >>>> in >>>>>>> the world prevent me from typing manually "mess" instead of >>>>> "msg"/"message" >>>>>>> or "svc" instead of "srvc"/"service" (btw "svc" is more common >> imo). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And the fact that someone name a variable "count" instead of "cnt" >>>>> doesn't >>>>>>> make the whole project immature. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Konstantin Orlov >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17 Jun 2021, at 08:34, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Nikolay, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, it is rather interesting. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do we all agree that using different conventions for different >> code >>>>>>>> packages does not break "consistency"? Or did I get something >>>>>>>> wrong? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2021-06-17 7:12 GMT+03:00, Николай Ижиков <nizhi...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We can create checkstyle rule to enforce usage of abbreviations. >>>>>>>>> Internal/public code differs by package. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PoC of rule [1] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9153 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 17 июня 2021 г., в 07:01, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nikita, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you have a plan in your mind how to make Ignite codebase >>>>> consistent? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> AFAIR, we had it intentionally inconsistent for a long time at >>>> least >>>>>>>>>> for one sake: for internal code we used special conventions >> (e.g. >>>>>>>>>> abbreviations, shorten getters) and common Java conventions for >>>>> public >>>>>>>>>> API and examples (e.g. no abbreviations and usual getters). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2021-06-16 23:37 GMT+03:00, Nikita Ivanov <niva...@gridgain.com >>> : >>>>>>>>>>> Consistency is what makes it easier to contribute to the >> project >>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> attract new members. Consistency implies strong, well defined >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> universally enforced rules. Just because we have some >>>>>>>>>>> individuals >>>>> who >>>>>>>>>>> are lazy or inexperienced - it does not mean that the entire >>>> project >>>>>>>>>>> should relax the basic-level engineering discipline. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On a personal node - nothing screams "immaturity" louder that a >>>> code >>>>>>>>>>> that uses inconsistent naming, commenting, code style & >>>>> organization, >>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Nikita Ivanov >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 5:56 AM Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org >>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I understand that this rule seems too strict or may be weird. >>>>>>>>>>>> But >>>>>>>>>>>> removing the rule could lead to review comments like "use >>>>>>>>>>>> future >>>>>>>>>>>> instead of fut". So my proposal is to change rule from >>>>>>>>>>>> "required" >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> "recommended". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:49 PM Valentin Kulichenko >>>>>>>>>>>> <valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin, thanks for chiming in. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's exactly my concern. Overformalization is generally not >>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>> good >>>>>>>>>>>>> thing. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Someone used "mess" to abbreviate "message"? That is surely >>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>> a >>>>>>> good >>>>>>>>>>>>> coding style, but that's what code reviews are for. I believe >>>> that >>>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>>>> committers are more than capable of identifying such issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> At the same time, with the current rules, we are *forced* to >>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>> abbreviations like "locAddrGrpMgr", whether we like it or >> not. >>>> All >>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> does >>>>>>>>>>>>> is makes it harder to contribute to Ignite, without providing >>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>> clear >>>>>>>>>>>>> value. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Val >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:46 AM Konstantin Orlov < >>>>>>> kor...@gridgain.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for making this optional >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Common abbreviation rules is good for sure, but sometimes I >>>>> getting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sick >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of all those locAddrGrpMgr. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Orlov >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jun 2021, at 14:31, Nikolay Izhikov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nizhi...@apache.org >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Anton, Alexei. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m pretty happy current abbreviation rules >> too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let see what we can do to make our codebase even more >>>>> consistent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7 июня 2021 г., в 13:23, Alexei Scherbakov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Common abbrevs add quality to the code. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 7 июн. 2021 г. в 12:38, Anton Vinogradov < >> a...@apache.org >>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can fix the code and set up the rule. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will help to prevent having a weird abbreviation >> like >>>>>>> "mess" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "message") or "ign" (from "Ignite"). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, the abbreviations list (hardcoded at IDEA plugin) >>>> allows >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names across the whole code, this should simplify the >>>> reading. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:49 PM Valentin Kulichenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also support removing this requirement. It’s not the >>>> first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brings this up, and so far we haven’t been able to fix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>> Not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my view. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Val >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 11:54 AM Nikolay Izhikov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nizhi...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, guys. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitry, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manual rule enforcement saves a couple of symbols in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m talking about automatic check. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can implement it easily. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, if we decide to keep this rule all we need is to >> fix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violations (several thousand!). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After it, checkstyle will automatically enforce this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rule. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, currently, any PR checked according to >>>> our >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkstyle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, take a look at little green check sign after PR >>>>> name. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5 июня 2021 г., в 00:57, Dmitry Pavlov < >>>> dpav...@apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for removal. Cnt and count both seem to be fine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manual rule enforcement saves a couple of symbols in >>>> code, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some time from both contributor and reviewer. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/04 19:18:37, Pavel Tupitsyn < >>>>> ptupit...@apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, we should remove this rule. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like a waste of time. freq or frequency, cnt or >>>>> count, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either way. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:39 PM Nikolay Izhikov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right now, we have the rule to use some predefined >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list >>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abbrevation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> variable names [1]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of the reviewers ask to follow this rule >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strictly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is required to use abbreviated form for code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistency. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried to implement this rule in form of checkstyle >>>>> check >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems like many of use doesn’t follow this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requirement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My check found 4124 violation in core module. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we make this rule optional in documentation >> or >>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completely? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or should someone proceed and fix all the >> violations? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Example of output: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgnitePdsWithTtlTest.java:94: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CACHE_NAME_LOCAL_ATOMIC! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loc, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of LOCAL [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgnitePdsWithTtlTest.java:97: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for CACHE_NAME_LOCAL_TX! >>>>> Please, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loc, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of LOCAL [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgnitePdsWithTtlTest.java:264: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for checkpointManager! >>>> Please, >>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgr, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Manager [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgnitePdsPartitionPreloadTest.java:63: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for DEFAULT_REGION! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, >>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dflt, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DEFAULT [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgnitePdsWholeClusterRestartTest.java:47: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for ENTRIES_COUNT! >> Please, >>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cnt, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COUNT [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgnitePdsRebalancingOnNotStableTopologyTest.java:49: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for CHECKPOINT_FREQUENCY! >>>>>>> Please, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freq, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of FREQUENCY [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgnitePdsTransactionsHangTest.java:75: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for MAX_KEY_COUNT! >> Please, >>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cnt, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COUNT [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgnitePdsTransactionsHangTest.java:78: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for CHECKPOINT_FREQUENCY! >>>>>>> Please, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freq, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of FREQUENCY [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/SlowHistoricalRebalanceSmallHistoryTest.java:57: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for SUPPLY_MESSAGE_LATCH! >>>>>>> Please, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> msg, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of MESSAGE [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgniteLogicalRecoveryTest.java:74: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for SHARED_GROUP_NAME! >>>> Please, >>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grp, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of GROUP [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> /Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/work/ignite/modules/core/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/db/IgniteLogicalRecoveryTest.java:200: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbrevation should be used for cacheLoader! Please, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>> ldr, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loader [IgniteAbbrevationsRule] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Abbreviation+Rules#AbbreviationRules-VariableAbbreviation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9153 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexei Scherbakov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> Ivan Pavlukhin >>
