But super long lines are a real problem while merging. It is super
inconvenient.
120 chars is a good compromise.

чт, 15 апр. 2021 г. в 14:39, Zhenya Stanilovsky <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid
>:

>
> Python is not so verbose as java )
> +1 for 140
>
> >Hi!
> >Personally, I suppose that 120 chars per line is OK. Moreover, many
> >codestyles suggests less chars per line.
> >For example PEP8 recommends 80 (but we use 120 in pyignite and flake8
> >codestyle checks it). Google java codestyle insists on 100.
> >
> >More than 120 chars is too long as for me and is not convenient for 3-way
> >merges.
> >
> >чт, 15 апр. 2021 г. в 12:28, Nikolay Izhikov < nizhi...@apache.org >:
> >
> >> Hello, Ilya.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the feedback.
> >>
> >> 140 characters is fine for me.
> >>
> >> > 15 апр. 2021 г., в 12:25, Ilya Kasnacheev < ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
> >
> >> написал(а):
> >> >
> >> > Hello!
> >> >
> >> > Please find attached the distribution of line lengths in the project,
> in
> >> the form of (count, line length).
> >> >
> >> > I think that we can enforce a hard limit of 140 chars per line. I
> think
> >> that having longer lines is excessive and does not benefit readability.
> >> >
> >> > Having a limit of 150 or 180 does not give us much since there's still
> >> a long tail which has to be fixed.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > --
> >> > Ilya Kasnacheev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > чт, 15 апр. 2021 г. в 11:30, Nikolay Izhikov < nizhi...@apache.org >:
> >> > Hello, Igniters.
> >> >
> >> > Right now, we have a code style rule [1] - the line should fit in 120
> >> characters.
> >> > But, this rule violated in many and many places through code.
> >> > I have a plan to add a check style rule to force maximum line length.
> >> >
> >> > For me, personally, 120 characters a bit old-fashioned restriction.
> >> > Should we increase the maximum line length to 150 or even 180
> characters?
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Coding+Guidelines
> >> > <linelengths.txt>
> >>
> >>
> >--
> >Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
>
>
>
>



-- 
Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy

Reply via email to