Pavel, good job and great benchmark results! чт, 26 нояб. 2020 г. в 15:01, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>:
> PR is ready for review [1] > > I've added a simple put/get benchmark, there is some performance > improvement over existing implementation, see results in the PR > description. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8483 > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:39 AM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Since there are no objections, I've updated the IEP accordingly [1] > > and started working on it [2] > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-60%3A+Java+Thin+Client+Non-Blocking+Async+IO > > [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8483 > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:07 PM Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I suppose that the best variant -- ability to switch to netty if this > lib > >> is in classpath > >> > >> пн, 9 нояб. 2020 г. в 15:58, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>: > >> > >> > Sounds like a good idea to me. > >> > > >> > Best Regards, > >> > Igor > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:32 PM Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 for using GridNioServer as java thin client communication layer. > >> > > > >> > > вс, 8 нояб. 2020 г. в 19:12, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>: > >> > > > >> > > > Igniters, > >> > > > > >> > > > This is a continuation of "Use Netty for Java thin client" [1], > >> > > > I'm starting a new thread for better visibility. > >> > > > > >> > > > The problems with current Java thin client are: > >> > > > * Socket writes block user threads > >> > > > * Every connection uses a separate listener thread (with partition > >> > > > awareness there is a thread for every server node within a single > >> > > > IgniteClient) > >> > > > > >> > > > GridNioServer can work in client mode and solves both of these > >> > problems. > >> > > > It is the most practical choice as well at the moment - no extra > >> > > > dependencies required. > >> > > > > >> > > > A potential drawback is increased coupling between thin client and > >> core > >> > > > code, > >> > > > which I'm going to mitigate by abstracting GridNioServer behind a > >> > simpler > >> > > > facade, > >> > > > so we can replace it with Netty or something else easier if we > >> decide > >> > to > >> > > > split the code. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thoughts, objections? > >> > > > > >> > > > [1] > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Use-Netty-for-Java-thin-client-td49732.html > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > >> > > > -- Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
