Sounds like a good idea to me. Best Regards, Igor
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:32 PM Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for using GridNioServer as java thin client communication layer. > > вс, 8 нояб. 2020 г. в 19:12, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>: > > > Igniters, > > > > This is a continuation of "Use Netty for Java thin client" [1], > > I'm starting a new thread for better visibility. > > > > The problems with current Java thin client are: > > * Socket writes block user threads > > * Every connection uses a separate listener thread (with partition > > awareness there is a thread for every server node within a single > > IgniteClient) > > > > GridNioServer can work in client mode and solves both of these problems. > > It is the most practical choice as well at the moment - no extra > > dependencies required. > > > > A potential drawback is increased coupling between thin client and core > > code, > > which I'm going to mitigate by abstracting GridNioServer behind a simpler > > facade, > > so we can replace it with Netty or something else easier if we decide to > > split the code. > > > > Thoughts, objections? > > > > [1] > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Use-Netty-for-Java-thin-client-td49732.html > > >
