Hello!

Do you mind if I push additional change to fix English in some of these
entries? A lot of these has times not concording with "fixed".

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


ср, 20 мая 2020 г. в 15:47, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:

> Hello, Igniters.
>
> I prepared a PR with release notes.
> Please, take a look [1]
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7821
>
> > 20 мая 2020 г., в 13:06, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov....@gmail.com>
> написал(а):
> >
> > Hello, Jury.
> >
> > It seems we reached code freeze step for 2.8.1 release.
> > I will prepare rc for it shortly.
> >
> >> 14 мая 2020 г., в 11:08, Юрий <jury.gerzhedow...@gmail.com> написал(а):
> >>
> >> Nikolay,
> >>
> >> Release 2.8.1 are delayed and announced dates [1] at release page is not
> >> actual. Could you update it to reflect current vision of release date?
> >>
> >> [1].
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>
> >> чт, 7 мая 2020 г. в 17:23, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >>> Done.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <garus....@gmail.com> написал(а):
> >>>>
> >>>> Nikolay,
> >>>> could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
> >>>>
> >>>> чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> TC results: [1], [2]
> >>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello, Alex.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 from me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
> >>>>>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
> >>>>>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for
> >>> cache
> >>>>>>> with indexed types
> >>>>>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and
> >>> entry
> >>>>>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
> >>>>>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
> >>>>> already
> >>>>>>> merged to master.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org
> >:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Taras.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thank you, very much!
> >>>>>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> OPEN:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC
> error
> >>> on
> >>>>>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform
> error:System.NullReferenceException -
> >>>>>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IN PROGRESS:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on
> >>> really
> >>>>>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready)
> >>>>> state
> >>>>>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. -
> Pavel
> >>>>>>>> Voronkin
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command -
> >>>>> YuJue
> >>>>>> Li
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
> >>>>>> handled
> >>>>>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
> >>>>>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
> >>>>>> checkpoint
> >>>>>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error:
> Unexpected
> >>>>> row
> >>>>>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related
> tickets
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>> port into 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability
> to
> >>>>>>>> disable SQL functions.
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values
> >>>>> while
> >>>>>>>> traversing index tree.
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full
> read
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
> >>>>>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
> >>>>>>>>> [2].
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
> >>>>>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was
> not
> >>>>>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are
> already
> >>> in
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> Mikhail.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <
> bessonov...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out
> that
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> need 3
> >>>>>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
> >>>>>> initial
> >>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
> >>>>>>>> components
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
> >>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have
> any.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits
> in
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> scope?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
> >>>>>>>> myself, I
> >>>>>>>>>>>> guess it would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <
> xxt...@gmail.com
> >>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
> >>>>> IGNITE-12683
> >>>>>>>> [1][2].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
> >>>>>> BPlusTree
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and
> >>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <
> >>> bessonov...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I
> mentioned:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1
> branch
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> contain
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
> lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in
> bug
> >>>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >>>>> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with
> >>> TCP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
> >>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on
> >>>>> node
> >>>>>>>> start.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1
> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >>>>> TcpCommunication
> >>>>>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >>>>>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
> lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in
> bug
> >>>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >>>>> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>> plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
> >>>>>>>> bessonov...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >>>>> TcpCommunication
> >>>>>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >>>>>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we
> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> probably ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are
> >>> you
> >>>>>> ok
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for
> >>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following
> commits:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> >>>>> INSERT
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
> >>>>> must
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> partition -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI
> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick
> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
> >>> uses
> >>>>>> log
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
> >>> when
> >>>>>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> >>>>> registration
> >>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >>>>>> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
> call
> >>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open
> files"
> >>>>>>>> exception
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL
> expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
> Fixes
> >>>>>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> >>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at
> the
> >>>>>>>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>>>>>>> generation for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
> >>> during
> >>>>>>>> PME can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> >>>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
> >>> Spring
> >>>>>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
> counter
> >>>>>> value
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> >>> number
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> >>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
> record
> >>>>>>>> type in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> >>>>> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version
> of
> >>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
> thrown
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> >>> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a -
> >>> IGNITE-12545
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduce
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to
> partition
> >>>>> map
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> >>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
> during
> >>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
> state
> >>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 -
> >>> IGNITE-12479
> >>>>>>>> Make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
> node
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
> record in
> >>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
> >>> recovery
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> >>>>> other
> >>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
> node
> >>>>>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a
> IGNITE-12227
> >>>>> Fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> >>> partition
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
> #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
> >>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between
> cache
> >>>>> data
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> >>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
> calculation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhikov....@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
> >>>>> commits
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
> >>>>>> results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1
> from
> >>>>> Mira
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
> >>>>>>>> upstream-http/master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with
> the
> >>>>>>>> dirty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> python
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv")
> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if not line.startswith('-'):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     ticket = line[:-1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     tickets.add(ticket)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     founded[ticket] = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in tickets:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     if ticket in commit_msg:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         print(commit_msg)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         founded[ticket] += 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
> >>>>>>>> configuration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
> uses
> >>>>>> log
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> >>> INSERT
> >>>>>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
> when
> >>>>>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> >>> registration
> >>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >>>>> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
> call
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
> >>> must
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> >>>>>>>> exception -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
> evicted
> >>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
> thread
> >>>>>>>> shutdown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
> Fixes
> >>>>>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view
> implemented.
> >>>>>>>> (#7495)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent
> deactivation
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> CLI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> >>>>>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
> refactoring
> >>>>>>>> (#7474)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> >>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at
> the
> >>>>>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>>>>> generation
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
> during
> >>>>>> PME
> >>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> >>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
> Spring
> >>>>>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
> counter
> >>>>>> value
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> >>> number
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> >>> eviction
> >>>>>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
> record
> >>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> >>>>> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> one -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version
> of
> >>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
> thrown
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> >>> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> >>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
> during
> >>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
> state
> >>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
> node
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record
> in
> >>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
> recovery
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> >>>>> other
> >>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
> node
> >>>>>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> partition
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
> #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
> >>>>> data
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> >>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
> calculation
> >>>>>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
> >>>>>> started
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on
> REPLICATED
> >>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField
> accessor
> >>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
> >>>>>> properties
> >>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
> >>>>>> lower-case
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't
> >>>>> show
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> histogram
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains
> underscore
> >>>>>>>> character
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
> >>>>>> available
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous
> tickets
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for
> >>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
> >>>>>> yourself
> >>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not
> it? I
> >>>>>>>> suppose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager
> (the
> >>>>>>>> current
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know
> who
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page
> [1]
> >>>>> who
> >>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> >>>>>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ivan.glu...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> >>>>>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan
> Pavlukhin
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator.
> Should
> >>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay
> Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this
> >>> thread
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plehanov.a...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1
> following
> >>>>>>>> bug-fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can
> >>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems
> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be
> used
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
> >>>>> properly
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this
> >>> prevents
> >>>>>>>> main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
> >>>>> checkpoint
> >>>>>>>> read
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]).
> This
> >>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> brings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a
> >>>>> large
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> number of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments
> introduced in
> >>>>>>>> 2.8.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim
> Muzafarov
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all
> >>> blocker
> >>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I
> think
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and
> schedule
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
> >>>>>>>> releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
> >>>>> Izhikov
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1
> release
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all
> commits
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in
> corresponding
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
> >>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only
> for a
> >>>>>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
> >>>>> Коптилин <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite
> >>>>> native
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
> >>>>> Kasnacheev
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macrerg...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
> >>>>> Maitra
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saikat.mai...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have
> >>> release
> >>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to
> merge
> >>>>>>>> these 2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM
> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else
> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> committers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I
> think
> >>> we
> >>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and
> dates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot
> that
> >>>>>>>> time,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for
> >>>>> guard
> >>>>>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48,
> Taras
> >>>>>>>> Ledkov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tled...@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
> >>>>> related
> >>>>>>>> to SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and
> Ignite
> >>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> contains
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
> >>>>>>>> thread-safe.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
> >>>>> issue,
> >>>>>>>> e.g.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated
> >>> cache,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
> >>>>> queries
> >>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable
> and
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's
> settle
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager.
> This
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
> >>>>>>>> schedule:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is
> there
> >>>>>>>> anybody
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM
> >>>>> Sergey
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> antonovserge...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket
> >>> IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Transaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
> >>>>>> ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53,
> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2]
> >>> branch
> >>>>>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32,
> >>>>> Alexey
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
> >>>>> commits
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that
> in my
> >>>>>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they
> >>> are
> >>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as
> >>> long
> >>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please
> share
> >>>>> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index
> creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO
> query is
> >>>>>>>> failing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
> >>>>> partition's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> states can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
> >>>>>> unstable
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential
> race
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
> >>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
> >>>>>>>> cluster and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
> >>>>> rentingFutures
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
> >>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect
> rewriting
> >>>>>> wal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may
> >>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is
> >>> enabled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
> >>>>> instead
> >>>>>>>> of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache
> for
> >>>>>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013
> >>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thrown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency
> >>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big
> >>> cache
> >>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
> >>>>>> illegal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set
> >>> serialized
> >>>>>>>> enum
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to
> >>>>> find
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching
> >>> checkpoint
> >>>>>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx
> desync
> >>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent
> partitions
> >>>>>>>> owned by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter
> difference
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition
> desync if
> >>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
> >>>>> between
> >>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
> >>>>>> difference
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> output
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
> >>>>> generated
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during
> purges
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Живи с улыбкой! :D
> >
>
>

Reply via email to