Nikolay,

Release 2.8.1 are delayed and announced dates [1] at release page is not
actual. Could you update it to reflect current vision of release date?

[1]. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1

чт, 7 мая 2020 г. в 17:23, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:

> Done.
>
>
> > 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <garus....@gmail.com> написал(а):
> >
> > Nikolay,
> > could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
> >
> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
> >
> > чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Nikolay,
> >>
> >> TC results: [1], [2]
> >> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
> >>
> >> [1]:
> >>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >> [2]:
> >>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>
> >> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >>> Hello, Alex.
> >>>
> >>> +1 from me.
> >>>
> >>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
> >>> написал(а):
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
> >>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
> >>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for
> cache
> >>>> with indexed types
> >>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and
> entry
> >>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
> >>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
> >> already
> >>>> merged to master.
> >>>>
> >>>> WDYT?
> >>>>
> >>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Taras.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you, very much!
> >>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OPEN:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error
> on
> >>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
> >>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
> >>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IN PROGRESS:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on
> really
> >>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
> >>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready)
> >> state
> >>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
> >>>>> Voronkin
> >>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command -
> >> YuJue
> >>> Li
> >>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
> >>> handled
> >>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
> >>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
> >>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
> >>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
> >>> checkpoint
> >>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
> >>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected
> >> row
> >>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com>
> >>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets
> to
> >>>>> port into 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
> >>>>> disable SQL functions.
> >>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values
> >> while
> >>>>> traversing index tree.
> >>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> >>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read
> >> to
> >>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
> >>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
> >>>>>> [2].
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
> >>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
> >>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already
> in
> >>> the
> >>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Mikhail.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
> >>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that
> >> we
> >>>>> need 3
> >>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
> >>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
> >>> initial
> >>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
> >>>>> components
> >>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
> >>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
> >> changes
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in
> >> the
> >>>>> scope?
> >>>>>>>>> If you don't,
> >>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
> >>>>> myself, I
> >>>>>>>>> guess it would be
> >>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
> >>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
> >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
> >>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
> >>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
> >>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
> >>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <xxt...@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
> >> IGNITE-12683
> >>>>> [1][2].
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
> >>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
> >>> BPlusTree
> >>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and
> >> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <
> bessonov...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch
> >>> that
> >>>>>>>>>> contain
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>
> >>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
> >>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with
> TCP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
> >>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
> >>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on
> >> node
> >>>>> start.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >> TcpCommunication
> >>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
> >>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>> plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
> >>>>> bessonov...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >> TcpCommunication
> >>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
> >>>>>>>>>> probably ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are
> you
> >>> ok
> >>>>>>>>>> with it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for
> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> >> INSERT
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
> >> must
> >>> be
> >>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> >>>>>>>>>> partition -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> >>>>>>>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
> >>>>>>>>>> contribution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
> uses
> >>> log
> >>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
> when
> >>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> >> registration
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >>> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
> >>> with
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> >>>>> exception
> >>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> >>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> >>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
> >>>>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>>>> generation for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
> during
> >>>>> PME can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> >>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
> Spring
> >>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
> >>> value
> >>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> number
> >>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> >> eviction
> >>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> >>>>> type in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> >> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >> deserialization
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
> >>> last
> >>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a -
> IGNITE-12545
> >>>>>>>>>> Introduce
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition
> >> map
> >>>>>>>>>> exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> >>> issues
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
> >>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
> >>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 -
> IGNITE-12479
> >>>>> Make
> >>>>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
> >>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
> recovery
> >>> on
> >>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> >> other
> >>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> >>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227
> >> Fix
> >>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> partition
> >>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
> >> data
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> >> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> >>>>>>>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>> nizhikov....@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
> >> commits
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
> >>> results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from
> >> Mira
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
> >>>>> upstream-http/master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
> >>>>> dirty
> >>>>>>>>>> python
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   if not line.startswith('-'):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       ticket = line[:-1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       tickets.add(ticket)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       founded[ticket] = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   for ticket in tickets:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       if ticket in commit_msg:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           print(commit_msg)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           founded[ticket] += 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
> >>>>> configuration
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
> >>> log
> >>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> INSERT
> >>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> registration
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
> >> with
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
> must
> >>> be
> >>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> >>>>> exception -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> >>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> >>>>> shutdown
> >>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> >>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
> >>>>> (#7495)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation
> >> in
> >>>>> CLI
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> >>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
> >>>>> (#7474)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
> >>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>> generation
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
> >>> PME
> >>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> >>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
> >>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
> >>> value
> >>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> number
> >>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> eviction
> >>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> >>> type
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> >> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>> one -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >> deserialization
> >>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
> >> last
> >>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> >> issues
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
> >>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
> >>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
> >> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery
> >> on
> >>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> >> other
> >>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> >>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
> >> is
> >>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
> >> data
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> >> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> >>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
> >>> started
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
> >>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor
> >>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
> >>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
> >>> properties
> >>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
> >>> lower-case
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't
> >> show
> >>>>>>>>>> histogram
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
> >>>>> character
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
> >>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
> >>> available
> >>>>>>>>>> then and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to
> the
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets
> >> for
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for
> >> 2.8.1
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
> >>> yourself
> >>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
> >>>>> suppose
> >>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
> >>>>> current
> >>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who
> >> is
> >>> a
> >>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1]
> >> who
> >>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> >>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
> >>>>>>>>>> ivan.glu...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> >>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin
> >> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should
> >>> not
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this
> thread
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plehanov.a...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
> >>>>> bug-fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can
> >> cause
> >>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
> >>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
> >> properly
> >>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this
> prevents
> >>>>> main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
> >> checkpoint
> >>>>> read
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This
> >> fix
> >>>>>>>>>> brings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a
> >> large
> >>>>>>>>>> number of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
> >>>>> 2.8.0
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov
> >> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all
> blocker
> >>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think
> >> we
> >>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule
> >> the
> >>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
> >>>>> releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
> >> Izhikov
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release
> >> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits
> >>> for
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
> >> release
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
> >> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
> >>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
> >> Коптилин <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite
> >> native
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
> >> Kasnacheev
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macrerg...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
> >> Maitra
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saikat.mai...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have
> release
> >>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
> >>>>> these 2
> >>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
> >> release
> >>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
> >>>>>>>>>> committers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think
> we
> >>> can
> >>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
> >>>>> time,
> >>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for
> >> guard
> >>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for
> the
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
> >>>>> Ledkov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tled...@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
> >> related
> >>>>> to SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite
> >> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>> contains
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
> >>>>> thread-safe.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
> >> issue,
> >>>>> e.g.
> >>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated
> cache,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
> >> queries
> >>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and
> >> we
> >>>>>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle
> >> on
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This
> >> is
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
> >>>>> schedule:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
> >>>>> anybody
> >>>>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM
> >> Sergey
> >>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> antonovserge...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket
> IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>> Transaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
> >>> ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2]
> branch
> >>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32,
> >> Alexey
> >>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
> >> commits
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
> >>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they
> are
> >>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as
> long
> >>> as
> >>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share
> >> your
> >>>>>>>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
> >>>>>>>>>> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
> >>>>> failing
> >>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
> >> partition's
> >>>>>>>>>> states can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
> >>> unstable
> >>>>>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race
> >> on
> >>>>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
> >>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
> >>>>> cluster and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
> >> rentingFutures
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
> >>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting
> >>> wal
> >>>>>>>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may
> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is
> enabled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
> >> instead
> >>>>> of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
> >>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013
> NullPointerException
> >>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> thrown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency
> >> issues
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big
> cache
> >>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
> >>> illegal
> >>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set
> serialized
> >>>>> enum
> >>>>>>>>>> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to
> >> find
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching
> checkpoint
> >>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
> >>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
> >>>>> owned by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference
> >> on
> >>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if
> >> a
> >>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
> >> between
> >>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
> >>> difference
> >>>>>>>>>> output
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
> >> generated
> >>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

-- 
Живи с улыбкой! :D

Reply via email to