Aleksey, > My propose: > ~ June 01 - 2.8.1 > ~ September 01 - 2.8.2 > ~ November 01 - 2.9.0
What is your motivation for such release schedule? I believe release should be features/fixes driven not by time/deadline driven. We can release 2.8.x versions every week yet (as maintenance releases). But I don't see any reason for 2.9 release at this moment. > Sberbank team, for its part, is ready to take on the work of management > interim releases. I am glad for your enthusiasm but I believe that release engineer role should be rotated in order to share experience and expertise in the release process between community members. On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 6:43 PM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > Folks, > > Not sure that we will be moving in the right direction discussing dates > with no clarity of what is to be released in a specific version. Instead, > let's talk out our plans/tasks first and then put them on a timeline. That > certainly applies to big releases such as 2.9 that deserve a separate > discussion (we can initiate Ignite 2020 directions/roadmap thread and come > up with releases schedule once the community is an agreement). > > As for the maintenance releases, such as 2.8.1, I would encourage us to > keep scheduling them based on necessity. For instance, we already see that > 2.8 goes with several regressions and significant issues, which makes it > reasonable to plan through 2.8.1 for a ~month from now. > > > - > Denis > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:38 AM Aleksey Chetaev <alex.chet...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, Igniters! > > I propose to discuss immediately the timing of 2.9.0 and interim releases! > > My propose: > > ~ June 01 - 2.8.1 > > ~ September 01 - 2.8.2 > > ~ November 01 - 2.9.0 > > > > Sberbank team, for its part, is ready to take on the work of management > > interim releases. > > > > Regards, > > Aleksey Chetaev. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ > >
