Hello, Petr. > I thought the release cycle should be community driven, not single donator.
We are the part of the global Ignite community, itn’t it? If you know some reason to postpone bug fix releases, please, write it down. > what's the haste with next minor version? Users of the Ignite actively try 2.8 release and sent the bug reports. You can find it on the user-list. I think we all want to provide fixes as fast as we can. So frequent releases is a good thing. Do you agree? > 12 марта 2020 г., в 17:48, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> написал(а): > > I thought the release cycle should be community driven, not single donator. > Should not 2.8.1 be bug fixing / stabilising release with release date as > soon as all issues are resolved? > > Also — what's the haste with next minor version? Cannot we deliver next fix > versions with per-feature release cycle until something big is on horizon, > and if it is already — why do we need 2.8.2 after 2.8.1 and not 2.9.0 along? > >> On 12 Mar 2020, at 17:38, Aleksey Chetaev <alex.chet...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, Igniters! >> I propose to discuss immediately the timing of 2.9.0 and interim releases! >> My propose: >> ~ June 01 - 2.8.1 >> ~ September 01 - 2.8.2 >> ~ November 01 - 2.9.0 >> >> Sberbank team, for its part, is ready to take on the work of management >> interim releases. >> >> Regards, >> Aleksey Chetaev. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ >
