I am totally support the idea with the planned and widely announced Hangout meeting between commiters and contributers and posting the link to the dev-list with the special Topic Name and short agenda. Maybe, the recorded video could be added to the YouTube (or to another platform) to share with the community members.
пн, 26 авг. 2019 г. в 22:23, Amit Chavan <achav...@gmail.com>: > Hi Denis, > > I really like the initiative for transparency and collaboration. Are there > any plans to help get new contributors up to speed with the project where > they can contribute effectively? Sometimes it can be intimidating to start > on a large project without some help or advice. Maybe assigning a mentor or > an existing committer can be useful or some slack channel people can ping > on. I am starting new on the project and have picked out newbie ticket from > the Jira board. As I make myself familiar with the code base maybe its good > to have some direction on which area should I focus more on etc. > > Thanks, > Amit > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:54 AM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Folks, let me share more details on why Anton started the conversation > > about Ignite Slack: > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/The-ASF-Slack-td43233.html > > > > Recently, a group of GridGain and Sberbank committers of Ignite has met > to > > discuss how to make our community more transparent and open. Anton and I > > took part in that meeting. The primary problems we see in regards to > > transparency and openness are as follows: > > > > - A lot of discussions on the dev list abrupts suddenly and it's > unclear > > whether a discussion is abandoned or something else is going on in the > > background with a task/bug/improvement. In many cases, we tend to fall > > back > > to faster communication ways like instant messaging, calls, or > > face-to-face > > meetings that are not visible to the rest of the community. Emails > (dev > > list) are the right communication channel but not for all of the > stages. > > - Change reviews seem to be in a chaotic state. Sometimes it takes > many > > rounds for a committer to urge another committer to do a review. In > many > > cases, the other committer might be simply overwhelmed with regular > > tasks > > imposed by an employer. It will be good to come up with some public > > tracking approach that will help us all to see who and when will be > > able to > > review certain changes and make them to Ignite. > > > > To address the problems we want to propose the following: > > > > - Keep using dev list the way you do today. No changes need to be done > > here. > > - Introduce Ignite Slack for instant messaging across all the > community > > members who are obviously employed by different companies. Ignite PMC > > will > > be managing channels for various topics. Go to Slack when email (dev > > list) > > conversation is no longer effective, the way we do daily, no need to > > complicate our lives just because we work on an open-source project > > together. > > - Two or more committers need to talk verbally? Go ahead and schedule > a > > meeting with Google Hangouts or another tool. Send an invite to the > dev > > list for those who'd like to join and listen or share opinion. Want to > > talk > > in your native language? Go ahead and put a disclaimer that a > > conversation > > will be in Chinese, Russia, French, whatever. Simple and open. > > - Don't know how soon you'll be able to review some changes and, thus, > > ignoring other committers requests? GridGain and Sberbank are ready to > > propose a solution here. Both vendors use an approach to cooperate > > between > > GridGain and Sberbank committers. Now we'd like to make it fully open > > and > > adjust for community needs if required. > > > > Thoughts, suggestions? I think we'll schedule a community meeting to > finish > > the conversation or discuss any cornerstone points. But start with your > > questions first. > > > > - > > Denis > > >
