Folks,

According to the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard [1] (Wikipedia is not
the ideal reference), the `/var/lib` directory is the `state
information. Persistent data modified by programs as they run, e.g.,
databases, packaging system metadata, etc.`
So, I'm +1 for `/var/lib/ignite` to place persisted Ignite files there.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard

On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 14:00, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, of course.
>
> В Пн, 26/08/2019 в 13:58 +0300, Petr Ivanov пишет:
> > Does this parameters intended to be overridden (for tests purposes for 
> > example) or it will be permanently sticked to this new directory without 
> > ability to change?
> >
> >
> > > On 26 Aug 2019, at 13:58, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 for '/var/lib/ignite'
> > >
> > > В Пн, 26/08/2019 в 13:28 +0300, Dmitriy Pavlov пишет:
> > > > +1 for '~/.ignite/work'
> > > >
> > > > пн, 26 авг. 2019 г. в 13:27, Anton Kalashnikov <kaa....@yandex.ru>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello, Igniters.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are a lot of variants was already proposed lets vote to one of 
> > > > > them.
> > > > > I made a list of possible paths which was mentioned earlier. I also
> > > > > included variants outside of home directory('user.dir') to this list 
> > > > > but I
> > > > > want to notes that we had already discussed it and we decided to 
> > > > > choose
> > > > > some path in home directory rather outside of that. Also If you have 
> > > > > any
> > > > > other variants feel free to add it.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) ~/.ignite/work
> > > > > 2) ~/ignite/work
> > > > > 3) ~/.config/ignite/work
> > > > >
> > > > > 4)/var/lib/ignite
> > > > > 5)/usr/local/ignite
> > > > > 6)/var/ignite
> > > > > 7)/var/lib/ignite
> > > > > 8)/opt/ignite/
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 for '~/.ignite/work'
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Anton Kalashnikov
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 26.08.2019, 12:39, "Nikolay Izhikov" <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > Ilya,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In development environment one can just run Java from 
> > > > > > > /var/lib/ignite
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Actually, I doesn't understand you.
> > > > > > Are you talking about development of some application that uses 
> > > > > > Ignite
> > > > >
> > > > > or contribution to Ignite code base?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If we are talking about some application that uses Ignite then we 
> > > > > > should
> > > > >
> > > > > decide, which scenario is primary.
> > > > > > (One more time, we are talking about PDS enabled caches):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Ignite server node started as separate java process.
> > > > > > 2. Ignite server node embedded in application as a library.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think, for PDS enabled cashes first case is primary.
> > > > > > In that case, user should install Ignite via some package(deb, rpm,
> > > > >
> > > > > docker, etc).
> > > > > > This package should done all required configuration.
> > > > > > Including directory permissions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This should be done like other DBMS do.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If we are talking about embedded Ignite then we can ask the user to
> > > > >
> > > > > provide sufficient permission for default dir or change dir to some 
> > > > > other.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, I still think we should use /var/lig/ignite for PDS data.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How it sounds?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > В Пн, 26/08/2019 в 12:23 +0300, Ilya Kasnacheev пишет:
> > > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In development environment one can just run Java from 
> > > > > > > /var/lib/ignite
> > > > > > > (makes total sense) and will immediately get almost correct 
> > > > > > > behavior
> > > > >
> > > > > (well,
> > > > > > > data will be stored to /var/lib/ignite/ignite/work)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > However, I still think that we should write to user.dir/ignite 
> > > > > > > and not
> > > > >
> > > > > just
> > > > > > > user.dir since current directory is often crowded.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fellows, anyone who is against using user.dir? Please share your
> > > > >
> > > > > concerns.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> >

Reply via email to