Hello!

We are talking about development scenario where you have embedded database
in your project and it has to write data somewhere.

/var/lib/ignite is certainly not writable by user's development projects.

We could use ~/.config/ignite, which is pure UNIX way today, but I object
against potential writing of gigabytes of WAL & PDS into user's .config.
~/ignite and descendants look like a good compromise. Writing to
user.dir/ignite, i.e. current work dir, looks equally good. I will create a
ticket about it.

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


пн, 26 авг. 2019 г. в 11:07, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:

> Hello, Igniters.
>
> There are plenty of options to store application files in linux:
>
> * /usr/local/ignite
> * /var/ignite
> * /var/lib/ignite
> * ~/.ignite/
> * /opt/ignite/
>
> Seems, ~/ignite/work (without a dot in the beginning) is not a Linux-way
> naming.
>
> Postgresql use '/usr/local/pgsql/`
> Mysql use '/var/lib/mysql`
>
> I, personally, like '/var/lib/ignite'.
> What do you think?
>
>
> > I doubt that users can attribute work/ directory in their home to Ignite,
> > especially when it is used as library by something else.
>
> I don't think we should fix this case somehow.
> If some application-provider uses embedded Ignite, it must do all
> configuration stuff inside application.
>
> Ignite should provide reasonable defaults, that's all.
>
>
> В Пн, 26/08/2019 в 10:33 +0300, Pavel Tupitsyn пишет:
> > I was certainly expecting ~/ignite/work too, not just ~/work
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:19 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I agree that ~/work is not expected. I was pretty sure it will be
> > > ~/ignite/work or ~/.ignite/work
> > >
> > > Sorry, but ~/work I may use for my day job stuff. I don't expect any
> files
> > > appear there if I start to play with Apache Ignite for the first time.
> > >
> > > Since it is a potential usability issue, which is very hard to change
> once
> > > we release product,
> > >
> > > I keep the vote open to having an option to cancel it if this
> discussion we
> > > come to conclusion product should use ~/ignite.
> > >
> > > пн, 26 авг. 2019 г. в 01:42, Павлухин Иван <vololo...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Ilya,
> > > >
> > > > 2 points:
> > > > 1. It is a good point that a directory name "work" in arbitrary place
> > > > can cause a lot of confusion.
> > > > 2. As far as I got, default directory is not in e.g. /home/username
> > > > but in one pointed by "user.dir" system property which is a directory
> > > > where a java process started (if property was not overridden).
> > > >
> > > > 2019-08-26 1:59 GMT+11:00, Ilya Kasnacheev <
> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Hello!
> > > > >
> > > > > I am really worried by the fact that previously we had /tmp/ignite
> and
> > >
> > > in
> > > > > it work/, whereas now we're going to write to /home/username/work
> > > > >
> > > > > I doubt that users can attribute work/ directory in their home to
> > >
> > > Ignite,
> > > > > especially when it is used as library by something else.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a chance we could move this work dir to
> /home/username/ignite
> > > >
> > > > with
> > > > > work/ (and possibly logs/) dir in it? WDYT?
> > > > >
> > > > > We could even auto-create README.TXT in this
> /home/username/ignite/ to
> > > > > describe that it's Apache Ignite work directory and how to change
> it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > пн, 12 авг. 2019 г. в 19:02, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for the user.dir as a default one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Denis
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Monday, August 12, 2019, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 to user home directory. A number of open source products
> create
> > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > dirs there. For me, it is a kind of expected behavior.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ivan mentioned an important point: binary meta & marshaller. We
> > >
> > > should
> > > > > > > update documentation and stop require PDS dir setup, but
> require
> > >
> > > home
> > > > > > setup
> > > > > > > (for older versions of Ignite, it is relevant anyway).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > пн, 12 авг. 2019 г. в 18:49, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> ptupit...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Ivan,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  fail Ignite node in case neither IGNITE_HOME
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > nor IgniteConfiguration#igniteWorkDir is set
> > > > > > > > I strongly disagree, this is bad usability.
> > > > > > > > Ignition.start() should work without any extra configuration
> as is
> > > >
> > > > it
> > > > > > > right
> > > > > > > > now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let's come up with reasonable defaults instead, user dir
> sounds
> > >
> > > good
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:45 PM Stephen Darlington <
> > > > > > > > stephen.darling...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes, when data is a stake, fail early is the absolutely the
> > >
> > > right
> > > > > > thing
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > do.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Stephen
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 12 Aug 2019, at 16:37, Ivan Rakov <
> ivan.glu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Anton,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Actually, the issue is even more unpleasant.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Official Ignite documentation says that it's possible to
> > > > > > > > > > configure
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > path
> > > > > > > > > where your persistence files will be stored:
> > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-persistent-store
> > > > > > > > > > However, even if you have set all path options (storage,
> WAL,
> > > >
> > > > WAL
> > > > > > > > > archive), Ignite will still store crucial metadata in
> resolved
> > > >
> > > > work
> > > > > > > > > directory (java.io.tmpdir by default). Example is binary
> > >
> > > metadata
> > > > > > > files,
> > > > > > > > > absence of which can make your data unavailable.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I propose to fail Ignite node in case neither
> IGNITE_HOME nor
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > IgniteConfiguration#igniteWorkDir is set. It's better to
> let
> > >
> > > user
> > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > > about missing configuration options during startup than
> let OS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > corrupt
> > > > > > > > > storage by cleaning temp dirs.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Ivan Rakov
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 12.08.2019 18:10, Anton Kalashnikov wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Igniters.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Currently, in the case, when work directory wasn't set
> by
> > >
> > > user
> > > > > > > ignite
> > > > > > > > > can resolve it to tmp directory which leads to some
> problem -
> > >
> > > tmp
> > > > > > > > directory
> > > > > > > > > can be cleared at some unexpected moment by operation
> system and
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > different
> > > > > > > > > types of critical data would be lost(ex. binary_meta,
> > >
> > > persistance
> > > > > > > data).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Looks like it is not expected behaviour and maybe it is
> > >
> > > better
> > > > > > > instead
> > > > > > > > > of tmp directory use the current working
> directory("user.dir")?
> > >
> > > Or
> > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > other idea?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > A little more details you can find in the ticket -
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12057
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > Anton Kalashnikov
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > Denis
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > >
>

Reply via email to