Ok, I updated the docs saying that "4. Add the following VM options to your Java applications. That's not needed if you use Java thin clients or Ignite JDBC." https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/getting-started#section-running-ignite-with-java-9-10-11
- Denis On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:30 AM Denis Mekhanikov <dmekhani...@gmail.com> wrote: > Denis, > > I didn’t find any usages of JDK internals in the implementation of the > thin clients. > It would be nice to verify in tests that thin clients can work without > these flags. > > Do our Java 9/10/11 tests include thin client testing? If so, do these > tests include these flags? > > Denis > On 15 Aug 2019, 11:09 +0300, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>, wrote: > > Denis, > > > > Does it mean we don't need to pass any flags from this list [1] at all > for > > the JDBC and thin clients? > > > > [1] > > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/getting-started#section-running-ignite-with-java-9-10-11 > > > > - > > Denis > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:56 PM Denis Mekhanikov <dmekhani...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > There are two JDK internal things that are used by Ignite: Unsafe and > > > sun.nio.ch package. > > > None of these things are used by thin clients. So, it’s fine to use > thin > > > clients without additional flags. > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > On 13 Aug 2019, at 23:01, Shane Duan <sduane...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Igniter, > > > > > > > > I understand that --illegal-access=permit is required for JDK > 9/10/11 on > > > > Ignite server. But do I have to include this JVM parameter for Ignite > > > Java > > > > thin client and JDBC client? I tried some simple test without it and > it > > > > seems working fine... > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Shane > > > > > > >
