Denis, I didn’t find any usages of JDK internals in the implementation of the thin clients. It would be nice to verify in tests that thin clients can work without these flags.
Do our Java 9/10/11 tests include thin client testing? If so, do these tests include these flags? Denis On 15 Aug 2019, 11:09 +0300, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>, wrote: > Denis, > > Does it mean we don't need to pass any flags from this list [1] at all for > the JDBC and thin clients? > > [1] > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/getting-started#section-running-ignite-with-java-9-10-11 > > - > Denis > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:56 PM Denis Mekhanikov <dmekhani...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > There are two JDK internal things that are used by Ignite: Unsafe and > > sun.nio.ch package. > > None of these things are used by thin clients. So, it’s fine to use thin > > clients without additional flags. > > > > Denis > > > > > On 13 Aug 2019, at 23:01, Shane Duan <sduane...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Igniter, > > > > > > I understand that --illegal-access=permit is required for JDK 9/10/11 on > > > Ignite server. But do I have to include this JVM parameter for Ignite > > Java > > > thin client and JDBC client? I tried some simple test without it and it > > > seems working fine... > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Shane > > > >
