Igniters, What do you think about the new API?
> 3 авг. 2017 г., в 15:56, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com> написал(а): > > Guys, > > I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, I was tired at the end of the day :-) > In the process of working on the task, I had to add 2 methods to the public > interface. > The first method is #isBackup(), it returns 'true' if cache is being updated > on the backup node. > The second method is #isPrimary(), it returns 'true' if cache is being > updated on the primary node. > Their main purpose is to show where a continuous query filter has been > invoked. > > Any thoughts about such solution? > >> 3 авг. 2017 г., в 14:45, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com> >> написал(а): >> >> Folks, >> >> As far as I see, Issue still in PatchAvailable state, what did you mean by >> "solved"? >> >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Sure. >>> >>> CacheQueryEntryEvent: >>> >>> public abstract boolean isBackup(); >>> public abstract boolean isPrimary(); >>> >>> >>>> 2 авг. 2017 г., в 19:56, Nikolai Tikhonov <ntikho...@apache.org> >>> написал(а): >>>> >>>> Max, >>>> >>>> Thank you for your contribution! Could you share here what exactly was >>>> added to interface? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Igniters, >>>>> >>>>> When you solved the 3878[1] ticket, two methods were added[2]: >>> isPrimary() >>>>> and isBackup() on the CacheQueryEntryEvent in a public API. Do you agree >>>>> with this decision? >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3878 < >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3878> >>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1393 < >>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>> ignite/pull/1393> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> Max K. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Max K. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > -- > Best Regards, > Max K. > > > > -- Best Regards, Max K.
