Guys, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, I was tired at the end of the day :-) In the process of working on the task, I had to add 2 methods to the public interface. The first method is #isBackup(), it returns 'true' if cache is being updated on the backup node. The second method is #isPrimary(), it returns 'true' if cache is being updated on the primary node. Their main purpose is to show where a continuous query filter has been invoked.
Any thoughts about such solution? > 3 авг. 2017 г., в 14:45, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com> > написал(а): > > Folks, > > As far as I see, Issue still in PatchAvailable state, what did you mean by > "solved"? > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sure. >> >> CacheQueryEntryEvent: >> >> public abstract boolean isBackup(); >> public abstract boolean isPrimary(); >> >> >>> 2 авг. 2017 г., в 19:56, Nikolai Tikhonov <ntikho...@apache.org> >> написал(а): >>> >>> Max, >>> >>> Thank you for your contribution! Could you share here what exactly was >>> added to interface? >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Igniters, >>>> >>>> When you solved the 3878[1] ticket, two methods were added[2]: >> isPrimary() >>>> and isBackup() on the CacheQueryEntryEvent in a public API. Do you agree >>>> with this decision? >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3878 < >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3878> >>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1393 < >> https://github.com/apache/ >>>> ignite/pull/1393> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Max K. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Max K. >> >> >> >> >> -- Best Regards, Max K.