+1 (non-binding) Thanks for adding this Steven! This will help greatly to reason about transactional consistency. I do want us to consider extending timestamp-ms to higher precision timestamp-ns (nanoseconds) to allow for greater transaction throughput.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 6:55 PM Hongyue Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) and thanks Steven! > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 2:53 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 11:03 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> I support requiring newly committed v4 snapshots to have a timestamp-ms >>> strictly greater than their parent on the same branch, while leaving root >>> snapshots, pre-upgrade snapshots and v1-v3 behavior unchanged. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Xuanwo >>> >>
