+1 (non-binding) Thanks Prashant!

On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 10:11 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1(binding)  Thanks Prashant!
> Yufei
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 10:02 AM Andrei Tserakhau via dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 6:41 PM Prashant Singh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I would propose to add finer grained read restrictions to the REST
>>> catalog.
>>> spec pr: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13879
>>>
>>> *Dedicated Sync (for this spec)* :
>>> - *Dedicated sync for Iceberg Finer Grained Read Restriction*:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/xddrotmxs7tyoc4jc5npwqs40vs120yr
>>> - *Sync recording*:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkifVhhWtccz39AjqMzYLbapmuz7xfvw3
>>> - *Notes from sync*:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/14nmuxxfzQsYo59o0Fbpb-pxOlzS6bVtduL8P8pwKZ6U
>>>
>>> *POCs*
>>>
>>> - Spark, end-to-end: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16082
>>> - Trino:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TBiHZxZHTRHoc58V7f4HJWZFAJwQlizFT7usDNhtT8s/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.asjamulmgn6n
>>> - Iceberg Generics: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16131
>>> - Actions: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16198
>>> - RCK coverage: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17809
>>>
>>> *Past Issues / Docs*:
>>> -
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iGNydKY7XT1N5Nz056vDPM0P8v0MFymGqNtOlUGUp-c
>>> -
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/108Y0E8XsZi91x-UY0_aHLEbmXDNmxmS5BnDjunEKvTM
>>> - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10395
>>> - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/14187
>>>
>>> Many thanks to the *entire Iceberg community* for the extensive
>>> discussions
>>> and invaluable feedback over the years, which have been instrumental in
>>> shaping this proposal into its current form.
>>>
>>> *Vote*
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  Adopt the spec change
>>> [ ]  0  No opinion
>>> [ ] -1  Do not adopt, because...
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Prashant Singh
>>>
>>

Reply via email to