Thanks for coordinating this and for starting the discussion on how to avoid this in the future, Danny!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 10:52 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up, Danny. I yanked the 0.10.0 release of > pyiceberg-core on pypi. It was released off of the main branch and contains > code that was not part of the 0.10.0 release. > > I think we can kick off the 0.10.1 release (using the same commit hash as > 0.10.0) and start a vote thread. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 2:54 AM Jones, Danny <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey folks, >> >> >> >> The release artifacts for pyiceberg-core were wrong (main branch instead >> of 0.10.0) and have been yanked – thanks to Vova Kot for highlighting this >> issue. >> >> >> >> We plan to run a release 0.10.1 with zero changes, simply a new set of >> releases targeting the right branch. We’d like to have this out soon if >> possible. >> >> >> >> Please do feel free to chime in, I’ve opened a tracking issue here too: >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/2907 >> >> >> >> Danny >> >
