+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 1:43 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 9:59 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 12:05 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1(binding). Thanks Prashant for working on this. Thanks everyone for
>>> the review.
>>>
>>> Yufei
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 12:02 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for working on this, Prashant! It will be great to get this in
>>>> to fix up scan planning filters, as well as to support new features like
>>>> check constraints!
>>>>
>>>> Ryan
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:48 AM Prashant Singh <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey Junwang,
>>>>> Thank you for the feedback, we responded to your comment, please have
>>>>> a look !
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Prashant
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 9:43 PM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Prashant,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 8:21 AM Prashant Singh <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Hello everyone,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I would like to call a vote to adopt PR #17138, which updates the
>>>>>> REST
>>>>>> > catalog OpenAPI specification so that its expression schemas align
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> > the expression grammar defined in the Iceberg expression
>>>>>> specification.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Pull request:  https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17138
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks a ton to Ryan Blue for authoring / driving the Iceberg
>>>>>> expression
>>>>>> > specification itself (https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16652
>>>>>> ).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The vote will remain open for a minimum of 72 hours.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [ ] +1  Adopt these changes
>>>>>> > [ ]  0  No opinion
>>>>>> > [ ] -1  Do not adopt (please provide a reason)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>> > Prashant Singh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I post a comment about the `required` fields changes, hope it makes
>>>>>> sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Junwang Zhao
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to