I also went ahead and added this PR <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16692> to the 1.10.3 milestone (and of course also applies to 1.11.1), I do think this is an important correctness fix for default value handling and evaluation against parquet metrics. The 1.11.x branch was created last week.
Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:36 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for the patch releases but have we created branch 1.11.x yet? > > Regards, > Manu > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:43 PM Tanmay Rauth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 for the patch releases. >> >> Thanks Amogh! >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:24 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for driving this Amogh ! >>> +1 for including preserving encryption metadata on DV merges to the >>> patch releases >>> >>> Best, >>> Prashant >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:07 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks folks, I've created a 1.10.3 milestone >>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/65> and I also added this >>>> PR <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15911> from Manu for >>>> addressing preservation of encryption metadata for DV changes. It looks >>>> close, and I just had some final comments on it. I think it's appropriate >>>> to include for a 1.10.3 release because the issue can be considered simply >>>> producing incorrect V3 metadata. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:49 AM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Amogh. >>>>> >>>>> This is very similar to the row lineage problem patched in the 1.10.2 >>>>> release. >>>>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:08 AM Neelesh Salian < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > +1 for patch releases. >>>>> > Thanks Amogh >>>>> > >>>>> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:01 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks for the fix! >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 for patch release for both 1.10.x line and 1.11.x line. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> For 1.11.x, I'd like to fix forward the iceberg-rest-fixture docker >>>>> image. We previously disabled it to unblock the 1.11.0 release. I have a >>>>> PR >>>>> for review, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16214 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Best, >>>>> >> Kevin Liu >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 5:23 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I reviewed the fix (#16699): it's a contained, well-tested v3 >>>>> correctness fix and a good candidate for both patches. I also agree we >>>>> should keep backporting v3 correctness fixes to 1.10, since this helps the >>>>> customers still on 1.10. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Thanks, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Huaxin >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 4:18 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> +1. Thanks for driving the patch releases. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>> Aihua >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2026, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> +1 >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> I think if we keep the backports narrow for 1.10, it would be >>>>> easy to release and help anyone who hasn't moved forward yet. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> -Dan >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026, 12:13 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1. Thanks Amogh! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yufei >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 12:08 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 patch releases. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> There is already a milestone for 1.11.1 >>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/63 >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 11:10 AM Amogh Jahagirdar < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Hey folks, >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> I'm kicking this thread off to discuss patch releases. I've >>>>> encountered a bug where the Spark rewrite manifests procedure does not >>>>> carry over first row IDs correctly. I have a fix PR out. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Are there any other fixes folks would be interested in >>>>> including in these patch releases? As a general reminder, patch releases >>>>> typically cover correctness fixes, security fixes, or addressing >>>>> significant regressions from the previous version. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> There's a separate question: should we continue patching v3 >>>>> metadata correctness fixes in 1.10, or should we just focus on 1.11. I >>>>> think since we made the claim that we want to have solid v3 support (not >>>>> necessarily all features, but certainly correctness) in 1.10 there's an >>>>> argument that we should continue to backport those specific fixes to 1.10. >>>>> A significant number of clients out there are on 1.10 and I think we >>>>> should >>>>> ensure correctness for them and it's probably easier for them to upgrade a >>>>> patch version than a minor version upgrade. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>> >>>>
