+1 On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 1:39 PM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 3:37 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I think that there is general agreement for adding an `unregister` >> endpoint to the REST spec, so I'd like to vote on the addition. The PR is >> #16400 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16400>. >> >> Unregister is the opposite of `register` and allows you to remove a table >> from a catalog without deleting its underlying data and metadata files. The >> purpose is to allow moving from one catalog to another. This requires a new >> endpoint because the underlying table data and metadata files should be >> left in place, and the latest catalog state of the table should be returned. >> >> Please vote in the next 72 hours, >> >> [ ] +1: Add unregister to the REST spec >> [ ] +0: Note a non-blocking concern . . . >> [ ] -1: Do not add unregister because . . . >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ryan >> >
