With the updates, I'm changing my vote to +1 I believe the vote was already called, so for procedure purposes, we should probably just start a new vote.
-Dan On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 9:39 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 6:07 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Gentle reminder to review the revised spec changes: >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15450 >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 5:21 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > FYI the required changes were implemented: >> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15450 >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Alex >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 9:49 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > With one binding -1, the vote does not pass. I will prepare the >> > > requested changes and start another vote thread when we're ready. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Alex >> > > >> > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 11:12 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > -1 (but I think we can address the concern easily) >> > > > >> > > > I just added a comment to the PR that's a blocker for me. We >> introduced an explicit enumeration of cloud providers which I strongly >> oppose codifying in the spec. >> > > > >> > > > That limits other providers from leveraging the signing portion of >> the spec without a spec change and is unnecessarily strict. >> > > > >> > > > This should be a simple update to address, but I can't support this >> change until we remove that. >> > > > >> > > > -Dan >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 8:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> +1 (non binding) >> > > >> >> > > >> Regards >> > > >> JB >> > > >> >> > > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 7:33 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Hi all, >> > > >>> >> > > >>> This is a second vote attempt in order to adopt the promotion of >> the >> > > >>> remote signing endpoint to the main REST spec. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Related links: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> ML thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2kqdqb46j7jww36wwg4txv6pl2hqq9w7 >> > > >>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15450 >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Please vote within the next 72 hours. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> [ ] +1 Adopt the promotion of the remote signing endpoint to the >> main REST spec >> > > >>> [ ] +0 >> > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not adopt, please explain why >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Thanks, >> > > >>> Alex >> >
