Hi everyone,

I’ve been following the recent discussions around S3-compatible backends for 
local testing and CI, especially the challenges around S3 compatibility and 
credential-related testing.

I’d like to propose an approach to help address:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/14638

I’ve opened an initial PR that switches the test backend from MinIO to 
SeaweedFS:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15577

The goal is to improve test reliability and better support scenarios that are 
currently difficult to validate.

SeaweedFS is an S3-compatible storage system with support for IAM-style access 
control and STS flows. One reason I explored this direction is that it may help 
with testing credential-related scenarios (e.g., temporary credentials / vended 
credentials), which have been discussed recently.

There are also a couple of areas that could potentially expand test coverage 
over time:

- Table-oriented bucket layouts could make it easier to exercise 
Iceberg-specific storage patterns that are currently hard to simulate in CI

- Support for IAM and STS flows could allow better validation of 
credential-related behaviors used by some catalog integrations

The current PR is intentionally minimal and focuses only on getting the 
existing tests running. If this direction is useful, I’m planning to follow up 
with additional integration tests (e.g., around table bucket behaviors).

I want to emphasize that this is mainly to address #14638 and improve coverage. 
If replacing the backend is too disruptive, I’m also happy to explore 
alternatives such as running multiple backends or limiting usage to specific 
scenarios.

I’d really appreciate feedback on:

- Whether switching the backend is a reasonable approach for #14638
- Any concerns around CI stability or maintenance
- Whether running multiple backends would be preferable
- Any specific scenarios we should prioritize testing

For context, I’m the author of SeaweedFS. SeaweedFS is open source under the 
Apache 2.0 license.

Thanks for your time and guidance!
Chris

Reply via email to