+1 closing PRs from bots or humans wrapping bots they don’t understand. Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau Pronouns: she/her
On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 6:47 PM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 8:53 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Some recent PRs look like they were made entirely by AI: finding issues, > writing code, opening PRs, and replying to review comments, with no human > review and no disclosure. > > > > Our guidelines already say contributors are expected to understand their > code, verify AI output before submitting, and disclose AI usage. The > problem is there's nothing about what happens when someone ignores them. > > > > Should we define consequences? For example: > > > > Closing PRs that were clearly not reviewed by a human before submitting > > Limiting contributions from people who repeatedly ignore these guidelines > > > > It's OK to use AI to help write code, but submitting AI output without > looking at it and leaving it to maintainers to catch the problems is not OK. > > > > What do you all think? > > Agreed. I'm not sure whether we could use a bot to detect and close such > PRs automatically. Having maintainers close them manually can be annoying, > but anyway, we should enforce the AI contribution guidelines. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Huaxin > > > > -- > Regards > Junwang Zhao >
