+1
Yufei

On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 9:37 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks for the feedback Ryan, splitted the PR into 2 :
> SPEC PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14867
> Client Side Impl : https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15572
>
> Best,
> Prashant Singh
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 9:12 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the spec changes, but I don't think that we should mix
>> implementation and spec changes in the same PR. Could you remove the
>> implementation changes?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 9:03 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey All,
>>>
>>> I propose adding *scan-planning-mode *to loadTable API, which is an
>>> optional value in the loadTable config section, which when present clients
>>> MUST use it to decide which mode of scan planning they wanna do, server
>>> side (using IRC scan planning API) or client side (client reading the
>>> manifest and then figuring out FileScan Tasks).
>>>
>>> For details please check :
>>>  - PR : https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14867
>>>
>>> Some summary on background discussion :
>>> We debated a lot offline on what does MUST means to the client, as if
>>> does the client has a liberty to fail fast if they have configured
>>> something in their client side config which is orthogonal to what server is
>>> suggesting and it feels like we had 2 options from the client end, either
>>> fail fast or let the server override the client side config, it seemed like
>>> server overriding the client side config with the client logging this as a
>>> warning is what i have implemented mostly from pov what's done *today*
>>> for other configs.
>>>  I do think we should think a bit more about how server side overrides
>>> go along with the client side configs (I understand this is more *client
>>> side* implementation details than directly related directly to server)
>>> and plan to start a thread discussing this more in depth. I wanted to share
>>> a summary of this discussion (which is captured in pr as well [here
>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14867#discussion_r2799750448>])
>>> to keep the wider community aware.
>>>
>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Prashant Singh
>>>
>>

Reply via email to