+1 (non-binding) Verified: - [x] Download links are valid - [x] Checksums and signatures - [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist - [x] No unexpected binary files - [x] All source files have ASF headers (RAT check passed) - [x] Can compile from source - [x] Source tarball matches git tag d62b36024ab36fc3f86be50634cd8b32ce3fb9a1 - [x] Built and tested from source - [x] Unit tests pass - [x] Integration tests pass
Thanks for running the release, Drew! On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 7:09 PM Drew <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Quick reminder for everyone else to take a look and verify the release! > > Checklist looks good on my end: > > - Download links work > - Checksums/signatures > - LICENSE/NOTICE files are included > - No surprise binary files > - ASF headers are in place > > Also built + tested with uv! > > Drew > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 3:17 PM Alex Stephen via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> [x] Download links are valid. >> [x] Checksums and signatures. >> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >> [x] No unexpected binary files >> [x] All source files have ASF headers >> [x] Can compile from source >> [x] Built and tested from source (w/ python 3.13) >> >> Thanks a lot! >> >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 6:32 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> [x] Download links are valid. >>> [x] Checksums and signatures. >>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >>> [x] No unexpected binary files >>> [x] All source files have ASF headers >>> [x] Can compile from source >>> [x] Built and tested from source (w/ python 3.13) >>> >>> Thanks for running the release! >>> >>> Best, >>> Kevin Liu >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 5:37 PM Shawn Chang <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> Verified on mac M3 pro: >>>> - GPG signature: valid >>>> - SHA512 checksums: valid >>>> - License headers (RAT check): passed >>>> - Unit and integration tests: passed >>>> >>>> Thanks Drew for helping with release! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Shawn >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 3:27 PM Drew <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg >>>>> 0.11.0 release. >>>>> >>>>> The commit ID is d62b36024ab36fc3f86be50634cd8b32ce3fb9a1 >>>>> >>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: pyiceberg-0.11.0rc2 >>>>> (e636578b6f597b55c460b2c44a851e4b23814012) >>>>> * >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/releases/tag/pyiceberg-0.11.0rc2 >>>>> * >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/tree/d62b36024ab36fc3f86be50634cd8b32ce3fb9a1 >>>>> >>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>> >>>>> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/pyiceberg-0.11.0rc2/ >>>>> >>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>> >>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>> >>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on pypi: >>>>> https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/0.11.0rc2/ >>>>> >>>>> And can be installed using: pip3 install pyiceberg==0.11.0rc2 >>>>> >>>>> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here: >>>>> >>>>> * https://py.iceberg.apache.org/verify-release/ >>>>> >>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>> >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as PyIceberg 0.11.0 >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>> >>>>>
