+1. There’s no known reason to exclude it, adding the ETag to
CommitTableResponse feels like a natural and consistent extension of the
existing behavior.

Yufei


On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 8:33 AM Christian Thiel <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hey Gábor,
> Thanks for the Feedback! I'll give it another day for others to chime in
> and otherwise start the vote.
> I am currently at a point where I need it in Rust and was surprised it
> wasn't there :)
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 at 16:39, Gábor Kaszab <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> There is no particular reason ETag is not included in the
>> CommitTableResponse in the spec. In fact the reference IRC already returns
>> ETag on that endpoint. I also had it in mind to extend the spec with this,
>> I just wanted to finish the implementation of using ETags on the client
>> side for the loadTable endpoint (side note, it's open for review
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14398>, any feedback is
>> appreciated!). In terms of implementation, it is not that trivial to
>> implement the usage of the ETag after a RESTTableOperations.commit() /
>> refresh(), but this is another story, just the reason I wasn't in a rush
>> extending the ETag support further in the REST spec.
>>
>> Long story short, I'm +1 on this!
>> Gabor
>>
>> Christian Thiel <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025.
>> dec. 4., Cs, 16:00):
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>> I noticed that we currently don't return an etag after single table
>>> commits.
>>> As of now, etags are returned for CreateTableResponse and
>>> LoadTableResponse. I browsed the original doc [1], the PR [2], the mailing
>>> List and my brain but couldn't find a discussion around this.
>>>
>>> Is anyone aware of a reason why we didn't include CommitTableResponse?
>>> If not I would start a vote on [3] to include it.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rnVSP_iv2I47giwfAe-Z3DYhKkKwWCVvCkC9rEvtaLA
>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11946
>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14760
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to