With 6 +1 votes (4 binding) this passes.

Thanks everyone, I'll get the PR merged.

On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 6:25 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Prashant
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 4:59 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:07 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 4:00 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 2:19 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Op di 18 nov 2025 om 22:11 schreef Ryan Blue <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks good to me. +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:44 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to VOTE on adding an optional *min-rows-requested* field
>>>>>>> to the request of the */plan* endpoint so that the client can send
>>>>>>> a *hint* to the server to not have to return more rows than
>>>>>>> necessary. It is not required for the server to return that many rows 
>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>> the scan may not produce that many rows. The server can also return more
>>>>>>> rows than requested.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The proposed OpenAPI spec changes can be seen in PR #14565
>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14565>.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Please vote within the next 72 hours:*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec
>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Eduard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to