+1 (binding) Thanks everyone for the votes. The vote result is: <https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#__codelineno-10-4> <https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#__codelineno-10-5>+1: 7 (binding), 7 (non-binding) <https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#__codelineno-10-6>+0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) <https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#__codelineno-10-7>-1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)
The vote is passed. I will merge the PR. On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 9:28 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 11:08 AM Aihua Xu <aihu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:07 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> Le lun. 15 sept. 2025 à 06:35, Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I like to raise a vote on a small spec fix that brings back added-rows >>>> in the snapshot fields. The spec issue was brought up by Christian Thiel in >>>> the 1.10.0 RC5 voting thread >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/rt4tk652wmw5ht9gb34dhrx1gwgolzkh>. >>>> >>>> Discussion thread: >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/29n4t7xfzx4g2pcgt3yzzwn1oqcot0nn >>>> >>>> Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14048 >>>> >>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Steven >>>> >>>
