+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 11:09 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 > > Op di 19 aug 2025 om 18:08 schreef Steve <hongyue.apa...@gmail.com>: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 8:43 AM Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:28 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 5:23 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:50 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:33 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 19, 2025, Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 3:35 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>>>> prashant010...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to mark 503 as non-retryable >>>>>>>>> error code for the Update Table. As it can lead to table corruption >>>>>>>>> otherwise. The proposed language in the spec pr also gives rooms for >>>>>>>>> servers who still want to use 503 for retries. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For details please check: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13619/files >>>>>>>>> Discuss Thread: >>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wg8m058z1jy9dss7jotx6g8h9ko1fxho >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
