+1 (non-binding) [x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and signatures. [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist [x] No unexpected binary files [x] Can compile from source
Ran `make build && make test` from both dist.apache.org and Github source links: - on Mac with M1 (arm64) CPU using Orbstack for integration tests, result = success. - on Linux with x86_64 CPU using Podman for integration tests, encountered errors not related to release sent PR. With PR result = success. Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release? Apache = apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-src.tar.gz Github = iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc.1.tar.gz Context: First time helping verify a release so the above question is very naive to what is normal. > On Jul 25, 2025, at 09:39, Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: > > Bump! We need just one more binding vote! > > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 8:18 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com > <mailto:2am...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> +1 (binding) >> >> Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on Linux >> x86-64 >> >> Thanks, >> >> Amogh Jahagirdar >> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com >> <mailto:liurenjie2...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> Hi, guys: >>> >>> We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please help >>> to verify it! >>> >>> We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with >>> deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it! >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:liurenjie2...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the >>>> release", I've added a fix) >>>> [x] Checksums and signatures. >>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >>>> [x] No unexpected binary files >>>> [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci) >>>> [x] Can compile from source >>>> >>>> I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE <st810918...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:st810918...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> [x] Download links are valid. >>>>> [x] Checksums and signatures. >>>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >>>>> [x] No unexpected binary files >>>>> [x] All source files have ASF headers >>>>> [x] Can compile from source >>>>> >>>>> Ran `./scripts/verify.py` >>>>> Built and tested, `make build && make test` >>>>> >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> >>>>> 于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道： >>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> I checked: >>>>>> - source distribution >>>>>> -- signature and checksum are good >>>>>> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good >>>>>> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but >>>>>> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment) >>>>>> -- No binary file found in the source distribution >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:xua...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version >>>>>> > v0.6.0. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The release candidate: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Keys to verify the release candidate: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need sometime >>>>>> > to update in the CDN. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Git tag for the release: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary >>>>>> > number of votes are reached. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > [ ] +1 approve >>>>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >>>>>> > >>>>>> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see >>>>>> > https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Checklist for reference: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > [ ] Download links are valid. >>>>>> > [ ] Checksums and signatures. >>>>>> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >>>>>> > [ ] No unexpected binary files >>>>>> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers >>>>>> > [ ] Can compile from source >>>>>> > >>>>>> > More details please refer to >>>>>> > https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Thanks >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Xuanwo >>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://xuanwo.io/
