Hi Steven,

Could you please include the following PRs, all related to authentication:

https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13215
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12562
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12563

The first one is a fix for a performance degradation in request
signing and imo should really be part of 1.10. The other two are
nice-to-haves.

Thanks,

Alex

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 5:46 PM Talat Uyarer <tal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> I would like to get in these prs too
>
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13111
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13212
>
> Thanks
> Talat
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 7:26 PM Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you so much for driving this release !
>> It will be really helpful in getting this critical table corruption bug fix 
>> out to iceberg users : https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12818 (Merged)
>>
>> Best,
>> Prashant Singh
>>
>> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 1:02 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > whether Spark 3.5 can perform some basic queries or provide file merging 
>>> > capabilities in the current or next version of V3?
>>>
>>> ConradJam, that should already work for a while now. I don't think we have 
>>> the exact Spark smoke test coverage as you described. But I can see that 
>>> Spark "testRemoveDanglingDVsAfterCompaction" creates a V3 table and 
>>> performs delete compaction.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 2:42 AM ConradJam <czy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would like to know whether Spark 3.5 can perform some basic queries or 
>>>> provide file merging capabilities in the current or next version of V3?
>>>>
>>>> Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> 于2025年5月29日周四 06:19写道:
>>>>>
>>>>> JB, please set the milestone to the multi-arg transform PRs/issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter/Max, ack on the changes targeted for 1.10. Let's see if they can be 
>>>>> reviewed and ready.
>>>>>
>>>>> Max, the initial plan is to cut the release branch on June 23. We can 
>>>>> confirm or fine tune the date as we evaluate the status of the reference 
>>>>> v3 implementations when it is close to June 23.
>>>>>
>>>>> @All, I created a doc to track the v3 spec reference implementation. I 
>>>>> tagged folks to get a sense of the status of the reference 
>>>>> implementations for v3 features.
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-iTb22_-BKIWrLV2lkVPaVb4hJhVy0dRrVpa-RSjXc8/edit?tab=t.ji574f5upocg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 3:29 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Steven,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When do you plan to cut the release branch? I would like to get
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12424 in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
>>>>>> <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Hi
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I think I have multi-args transforms in good shape to be in the scope
>>>>>> > for 1.10.0. Related to V3 spec, it would be great to include it in
>>>>>> > 1.10.0 release.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks !
>>>>>> > Regards
>>>>>> > JB
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 8:08 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > As discussed in the community sync, we are planning for the next 
>>>>>> > > 1.10.0 release. I will serve as the release manager after chatting 
>>>>>> > > with Russel (the original RM volunteer).
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > The adoption of V3 spec changes has been just approved. One of the 
>>>>>> > > main goals for this release is to complete the reference 
>>>>>> > > implementation for most V3 features.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > There are also other important changes ready.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > * Spark 4.0 support
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > * Flink 2.0 support
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > The target date for this release is the end of June. There is 
>>>>>> > > already an "Iceberg 1.10.0" milestone. Feel free to add relevant PRs 
>>>>>> > > and issues to the milestone for tracking purposes.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Thanks,
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Steven
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best
>>>>
>>>> ConradJam

Reply via email to