+1, thanks Russell!

Best regards,
Honah

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 6:49 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1, thanks Russell for driving this!
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 8:12 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> That was a bit of what we discussed at the sync this morning. Whether we
>> should have a generic enable feature update for one way features that we
>> don’t have the ability to disable. We couldn’t come up with more examples
>> of features we actually wanted to add. I think I’d we have at least two
>> more it would make sense.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 6:04 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Just a minor question added to the PR.  We're adding an explicit
>>> 'enable' as an update type and I wonder if it would be better to generalize
>>> it so that we don't have separate updates to disable/enable (more forward
>>> thinking as this is the first case quite like this).
>>>
>>> -Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 3:55 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 Thanks Russell
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:50 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:51 PM Russell Spitzer <
>>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Y'all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet another Row Lineage Spec update. This adds a MetadataUpdate
>>>>>> EnableRowLineage to the REST Spec. We briefly talked today
>>>>>> about an alternative EnableFeature(Feature Name) API instead but in
>>>>>> the absence of other features it doesn't seem
>>>>>> like that's really a requirement now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agreed that if we ever do have another feature we want to enable in
>>>>>> a similar way I would take the blame for adding
>>>>>> this API rather than a generic one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said please take a look
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12050
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note: We only allow enabling row lineage, it cannot be disabled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your time,
>>>>>> Russ
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to