I don't think can include the statement: "Metrics must be accurate if
written"
Equality deletes make this requirement very difficult to satisfy for some
of the fields.
The reason I suggested appendix was that we shouldn't be adding new
requirements, just documenting field names for consistency across
implementations.
-Dan
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 8:07 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> @Daniel Weeks what do you think?
>
> I know both you and I had the opposite feeling here.
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 6:21 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The content looks correct to me, but because this states a requirement
>> ("Metrics must be accurate if written") I would rather move this content
>> into the section on the snapshot summary instead of an appendix.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:30 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 non-binding
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:21 PM Steve Zhang
>>> <hongyue_zh...@apple.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 non-binding
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Steve Zhang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 14, 2025, at 1:14 PM, Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 non-binding.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
