Hi Thank you so much for considering my thoughts.
> Shall we sync up through the open tracking issue / slack on those steps? That's will be nice! On Fri, Nov 29, 2024, at 03:32, Sung Yun wrote: > Hi Xuanwo, > > Thank you for sharing your thoughts! I think that makes a strong > argument for coupling the releases together, and and I agree that it > would be beneficial for the community to prioritize ease of > troubleshooting, and maintainability. > > Following the release guidelines > (https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html) for Iceberg-Rust, I've > started a tracking issue to help work towards the 0.4.0 release: > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/739 > >> I am willing to implement the release scripts needed for Sung Yun to execute >> the release. > > And yes, I'd gladly take up on your help in codifying any process > that's not easy to execute as per the release documentation! Shall we > sync up through the open tracking issue / slack on those steps? > > Sung > > On 2024/11/28 16:10:08 Xuanwo wrote: >> Hi, Sung Yun & Kevin Liu >> >> I personally believe it would be beneficial for iceberg-rust and >> pyiceberg_core to be released at the same time. This approach ensures that >> pyiceberg_core always references a tagged version of iceberg-rust, which is >> advantageous for debugging purposes. >> >> I am willing to implement the release scripts needed for Sung Yun to execute >> the release. Please let me know your thoughts. >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024, at 02:53, Fokko Driesprong wrote: >> > Hey Sung, >> > >> > All for it, and happy to help as well. I'll add it to the agenda for >> > tomorrow's Rust sync >> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/0t1w33jg9gmcwfnx9fplq48h1d4kjfn9>. We'll >> > make sure to publish the notes since it is on a US holiday. >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > Fokko >> > >> > Op wo 27 nov 2024 om 19:30 schreef Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>: >> >> Thanks for driving this, Sung! I'm +1 to release both iceberg-rust and >> >> pyiceberg_core. It's very exciting to see pyiceberg_core and its >> >> integration with PyIceberg. >> >> It makes sense to decouple pyiceberg_core from iceberg-rust since the two >> >> "projects" are on different tracks. We'd want to release pyiceberg_core >> >> features independent of iceberg-rust features. >> >> >> >> Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help. >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Kevin Liu >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 6:13 AM Sung Yun <sun...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, it's been some time since we've done an Iceberg Rust release, >> >>> and we've finally set up the ghactions workflow[1] that will allow us to >> >>> build and publish an abi3 compatible wheel to Pypi. >> >>> >> >>> If we are still +1 for the release (both iceberg-rust and >> >>> pyiceberg_core), I think it'll be awesome to get this release out soon >> >>> as it will help the PyIceberg community test out the pyiceberg_core >> >>> binding in preparation for the next release. >> >>> >> >>> Another option would be to introduce a workflow_dispatch trigger to the >> >>> python_release.yml and run a decoupled, release for pyiceberg_core[2] >> >>> >> >>> I'd be happy to help run the release, if no one has started looking into >> >>> it already. >> >>> >> >>> Sung >> >>> >> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/705 >> >>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/j22o7yktrlddrgkcy7gl88o23nyrgooc >> >>> >> >>> On 2024/09/05 14:06:10 xianjin wrote: >> >>> > +1 for this pyiceberg_core as well. >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > Two cents about the iceberg-rust release schedule: it seems too >> >>> > aggressive to >> >>> > release by 2 weeks, monthly(4 weeks) release would be a nice fit. >> >>> > >> >>> > Sent from my iPhone >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > On Sep 5, 2024, at 8:25 PM, Sung Yun <sungwy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Thank you for driving this Xuanwo! >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > +1 as well, as noted the 0.1.0 pyiceberg_core release will allow >> >>> > > PyIceberg >> >>> > > to begin integrating with the rust based core and introduce a new >> >>> > > feature >> >>> > > that the community is looking for. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 6:05 AM Renjie Liu >> >>> > > <[liurenjie2...@gmail.com](mailto:liurenjie2...@gmail.com)> wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> +1 for this release. >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> As iceberg-rust is under fast development, a shorter release (3-4 >> >>> > >> weeks) >> >>> > schedule would benefit users so that they don't need to rely on a >> >>> > snapshot >> >>> > version. >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:26 PM Xuanwo >> >>> > <[xua...@apache.org](mailto:xua...@apache.org)> wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >>> Hello, everyone >> >>> > > >> >>> > > I'm starting this thread to discuss the release of iceberg rust >> >>> > > 0.4.0 and >> >>> > > iceberg pyiceberg_core 0.1.0. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > There is no specific reason for this release. I just want to align >> >>> > > with the >> >>> > > two- to three-week release schedule of iceberg rust so users don't >> >>> > > have to >> >>> > > wait long or encounter too many breaking changes at once. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Additionally, the pyiceberg team is awaiting our first release of >> >>> > > pyiceberg_core 0.1.0 so they can integrate with it, see how it >> >>> > > works, and >> >>> > > explore ways to improve collaboration. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > What do you think? >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Xuanwo >> >>> > > >> >>> > > <https://xuanwo.io/> >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> Xuanwo >> >> https://xuanwo.io/ >> -- Xuanwo https://xuanwo.io/
