Hi, Sung Yun & Kevin Liu I personally believe it would be beneficial for iceberg-rust and pyiceberg_core to be released at the same time. This approach ensures that pyiceberg_core always references a tagged version of iceberg-rust, which is advantageous for debugging purposes.
I am willing to implement the release scripts needed for Sung Yun to execute the release. Please let me know your thoughts. On Thu, Nov 28, 2024, at 02:53, Fokko Driesprong wrote: > Hey Sung, > > All for it, and happy to help as well. I'll add it to the agenda for > tomorrow's Rust sync > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/0t1w33jg9gmcwfnx9fplq48h1d4kjfn9>. We'll > make sure to publish the notes since it is on a US holiday. > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op wo 27 nov 2024 om 19:30 schreef Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>: >> Thanks for driving this, Sung! I'm +1 to release both iceberg-rust and >> pyiceberg_core. It's very exciting to see pyiceberg_core and its integration >> with PyIceberg. >> It makes sense to decouple pyiceberg_core from iceberg-rust since the two >> "projects" are on different tracks. We'd want to release pyiceberg_core >> features independent of iceberg-rust features. >> >> Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help. >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 6:13 AM Sung Yun <sun...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Hi folks, it's been some time since we've done an Iceberg Rust release, and >>> we've finally set up the ghactions workflow[1] that will allow us to build >>> and publish an abi3 compatible wheel to Pypi. >>> >>> If we are still +1 for the release (both iceberg-rust and pyiceberg_core), >>> I think it'll be awesome to get this release out soon as it will help the >>> PyIceberg community test out the pyiceberg_core binding in preparation for >>> the next release. >>> >>> Another option would be to introduce a workflow_dispatch trigger to the >>> python_release.yml and run a decoupled, release for pyiceberg_core[2] >>> >>> I'd be happy to help run the release, if no one has started looking into it >>> already. >>> >>> Sung >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/705 >>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/j22o7yktrlddrgkcy7gl88o23nyrgooc >>> >>> On 2024/09/05 14:06:10 xianjin wrote: >>> > +1 for this pyiceberg_core as well. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Two cents about the iceberg-rust release schedule: it seems too >>> > aggressive to >>> > release by 2 weeks, monthly(4 weeks) release would be a nice fit. >>> > >>> > Sent from my iPhone >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > On Sep 5, 2024, at 8:25 PM, Sung Yun <sungwy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Thank you for driving this Xuanwo! >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > +1 as well, as noted the 0.1.0 pyiceberg_core release will allow >>> > > PyIceberg >>> > > to begin integrating with the rust based core and introduce a new >>> > > feature >>> > > that the community is looking for. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 6:05 AM Renjie Liu >>> > > <[liurenjie2...@gmail.com](mailto:liurenjie2...@gmail.com)> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >> +1 for this release. >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> As iceberg-rust is under fast development, a shorter release (3-4 >>> > >> weeks) >>> > schedule would benefit users so that they don't need to rely on a snapshot >>> > version. >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:26 PM Xuanwo >>> > <[xua...@apache.org](mailto:xua...@apache.org)> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>> Hello, everyone >>> > > >>> > > I'm starting this thread to discuss the release of iceberg rust 0.4.0 >>> > > and >>> > > iceberg pyiceberg_core 0.1.0. >>> > > >>> > > There is no specific reason for this release. I just want to align >>> > > with the >>> > > two- to three-week release schedule of iceberg rust so users don't have >>> > > to >>> > > wait long or encounter too many breaking changes at once. >>> > > >>> > > Additionally, the pyiceberg team is awaiting our first release of >>> > > pyiceberg_core 0.1.0 so they can integrate with it, see how it works, >>> > > and >>> > > explore ways to improve collaboration. >>> > > >>> > > What do you think? >>> > > >>> > > Xuanwo >>> > > >>> > > <https://xuanwo.io/> >>> > > >>> > >>> > Xuanwo https://xuanwo.io/
