Thanks for keeping track of this, Honah!

+1 to keep the Wednesday 9 AM Pacific Time meeting every 3 weeks

I'm ok to pause the 8 PM PST meeting - this time does not work for me
personally.

As for two time slots recurring every 6 weeks each, IMHO, if people in
those meetings end up being distinct groups because of time zones being too
far off, I'd prefer to have the same 3 week cadence. It won't cause extra
burden if there's no overlap.

Cheers,
Dmitri.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 6:48 PM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Thank you all for your participation in the catalog community sync so far!
> I'm writing to discuss changes to the meeting schedule to better fit
> everyone's availability and make our discussions more productive.
>
> Here’s a quick summary of the current cadence
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/f7q72ls32f9lxy94d203zzz66tlslbxr>:
>
>    - Wednesday 9 AM Pacific Time: Recurring every 3 weeks since August 7
>    (most recent: Nov 20).
>    - Wednesday 8 PM Pacific Time: Recurring every 3 weeks since August 14
>    (most recent: Nov 6).
>
> Given the upcoming U.S. Thanksgiving holiday, I suggest we *cancel* the 
> *November
> 27, 8 PM* meeting.
>
> Additionally, as Jack mentioned in a previous thread
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/zfds1hcwwoyqzjx081jymktyodv7shrh>,
> there’s been discussion about reducing the meeting frequency to once every
> 3 weeks (instead of twice). With that in mind, I propose the following as a
> starting point for discussion:
>
>    - Keep the Wednesday 9 AM Pacific Time meeting every 3 weeks
>    - Pause the Wednesday 8 PM Pacific Time meeting for now and explore a
>    suitable alternative time for participants in different time zones.
>    - Once we find a time that works for other regions, switch to a new
>    cadence:
>       - Wednesday 9 AM PT: Recurring every 6 weeks.
>       - [Alternative Time for Other Time Zones]: Recurring every 6 weeks,
>       offset by 3 weeks from the 9 AM meeting.
>
> I’d love to hear your thoughts on this or any suggestions for alternative
> approaches that might work better for the community. Please share your
> feedback, and let’s discuss what works best for everyone and coordinate
> accordingly.
>
> Best regards,
> Honah
>

Reply via email to