The updates and fixes have been merged, with help from @Fokko a new RC has been put up. I'll send out the new vote email shortly!
Thanks all! On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 1:38 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > @Matt yes the licensing is a blocker unfortunately, so we should cancel > the RC and start an RC1 vote once this is fixed. > I should have properly voted in the earlier email, but will do it now. > > -1 (binding) due to the licensing > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 5:47 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> -1 (non binding) >> >> I'm sorry Matt, but the LICENSE is not correct in the source >> distribution: it contains reference to gradle, parquet, etc. >> So, the LICENSE is probably a copy from iceberg java. I suggest to >> start from "regular" LICENSE and add the go section. >> >> The rest looks good: >> - NOTICE is OK >> - hash and signature are OK >> - ASF header present >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 11:12 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of Apache >> Iceberg Go version v0.1.0. >> > >> > This release candidate is based on commit: >> adc8193de3299b04c9763c2fba529a7b94d080ce [1] >> > >> > The source release rc0 is hosted at [2]. >> > >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, >> and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate. >> > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg Go v0.1.0 >> > [ ] +0 >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Iceberg Go v0.1.0 because... >> > >> > Thanks! >> > --Matt >> > >> > [1]: >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/tree/adc8193de3299b04c9763c2fba529a7b94d080ce >> > [2]: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/releases/v0.1.0-rc0 >> > [3]: >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify >> >
