+1 (binding)
Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17)
-Dan
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:23 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified signature, checksum, license
> - Ran build and test with JDK 11 and 17
> - Ran AWS integration tests
> - Ran on Spark 3.5 with some manual tests
>
> Best,
> Jack Ye
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 9:01 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> Verified signatures/checksums/license and ran build/tests with JDK17.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 10:35 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> Verified signature, checksum, license, build.
>>>
>>> Successfully tested the following Spark SQL commands on Polaris, using
>>> Spark 3.5.3 with the binary artifacts Iceberg 1.7.0 jar. All operations
>>> worked as expected.
>>>
>>> create database db1;
>>> show databases;
>>> create table db1.t1 (id int, name string);
>>> insert into db1.t1 values (1, 'a');
>>> select * from db1.t1;
>>> insert into db1.t1 values (2, 'b');
>>> call polaris.system.expire_snapshots('db1.t1', timestamp '2024-11-11');
>>> select * from db1.t1.snapshots;
>>>
>>> Notably, the snapshot summary shows the latest Iceberg version:
>>>
>>> 2024-11-05 18:31:10.92 2780504056765263301 5332711584219924798 append
>>> file:/tmp/polaris/db1/t1/metadata/snap-2780504056765263301-1-634b033c-45dd-40d6-8cb4-468fe6015ba4.avro
>>> {
>>> "added-data-files": "1",
>>> "added-files-size": "611",
>>> "added-records": "1",
>>> "app-id": "local-1730860071427",
>>> "changed-partition-count": "1",
>>> "engine-name": "spark",
>>> "engine-version": "3.5.3",* "iceberg-version": "Apache Iceberg 1.7.0
>>> (commit 5f7c992ca673bf41df1d37543b24d646c24568a9)",
>>> * "spark.app.id": "local-1730860071427",
>>> "total-data-files": "2",
>>> "total-delete-files": "0",
>>> "total-equality-deletes": "0",
>>> "total-files-size": "1222",
>>> "total-position-deletes": "0",
>>> "total-records": "2"
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Yufei
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:58 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>
>>>> I checked:
>>>> - Parquet has been updated
>>>> - the planned Avro readers used in both Flink and Spark, they are
>>>> actually used
>>>> - Signature and hash are good
>>>> - No binary file found in the source distribution
>>>> - ASF header is present in all expected file
>>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE look good
>>>> - Build is OK
>>>> - Tested using Spark SQL with JDBC Catalog and Apache Polaris without
>>>> problem
>>>>
>>>> Thanks !
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 9:46 PM Russell Spitzer
>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi y'all!
>>>> >
>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>> Iceberg 1.7.0 release.
>>>> >
>>>> > The commit ID is 5f7c992ca673bf41df1d37543b24d646c24568a9
>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.0-rc1
>>>> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.0-rc1
>>>> > *
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/5f7c992ca673bf41df1d37543b24d646c24568a9
>>>> >
>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>> > *
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.7.0-rc1
>>>> >
>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>> > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
>>>> >
>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>> repository URL is:
>>>> > *
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1176/
>>>> >
>>>> > Difference between 1.7.0 and 1.6.1
>>>> >
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/compare/apache-iceberg-1.6.1...apache-iceberg-1.7.0-rc1
>>>> >
>>>> > Difference between 1.7.0 RC1 and 1.7.0 RC0
>>>> >
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/compare/apache-iceberg-1.7.0-rc0...apache-iceberg-1.7.0-rc1
>>>> >
>>>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>>>> >
>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>> >
>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.7.0
>>>> > [ ] +0
>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>> >
>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
>>>> encouraged to cast
>>>>
>>>
